高级检索+

不同品种及采收时期番茄果实的品质分析

Quality Analysis of Tomato Fruits in Different Varieties and Harvest Periods

  • 摘要: 以丰收560、京采8号、Cap、Saopolo和Jua 5个番茄品种为研究对象,设置了5个采收时期,通过测定可溶性固形物、可滴定酸、可溶性糖含量等品质指标,分析不同品种番茄及采收时期的品质差异性,以期为番茄品质分级提供依据。结果表明:不同番茄品种的品质存在明显差异性,其中Saopolo的可溶性固形物、可溶性糖、可滴定酸、VC含量平均值最高,分别为8.92%、7.35%、0.66%和4.57 mg/g,均显著高于除Jua外的其他品种;丰收560的可溶性固形物、可溶性糖含量平均值最低,分别为3.64%、2.04%;不同采收时期的番茄果实品质存在一定差异性,其中可溶性固形物含量、固酸比、VC含量和a*值等果实品质均存在显著差异,可溶性糖含量、可滴定酸含量、糖酸比、L*值、硬度和感官品质等差异较小。综上,在番茄品质分级时,可将可溶性糖含量、可滴定酸含量、糖酸比、L*值、硬度和感官品质作为分级指标,以减少采收时期对品质分级的影响。

     

    Abstract: In order to provide evidence for tomato quality grading, five tomato varieties were used as experimental materials by analyzing the quality indexes including soluble solids, soluble sugar, titratable acid and etc., to determine the quality difference between tomato varieties during five harvest time. The results suggested that there were significant differences in the quality of five tomato varieties. The average contents of soluble solid, titratable acid,soluble sugar and VC of ‘Saopolo’ were 8.92%, 7.35%, 0.66% and 4.57 mg/g, respectively, which were significantly higher than the other varieties except ‘Jua’. The average contents of soluble solid and soluble sugar of ‘Harvest560’ were the lowest, only 3.64% and 2.04% respectively. There were certain differences on tomato quality during multiple harvest time, including soluble solid, solid acid ratio, VC and a*value, but had no significant differences on the soluble sugar content, titratable acid content, sugar acid ratio, L*value, hardness and sensory quality. Therefore,soluble sugar content, titratable acid content, sugar and acid ratio, L*value, hardness and sensory quality should be used as grading indexes to reduce the influence of harvest periods.

     

/

返回文章
返回