高级检索+

不同生长期串叶松香草氨基酸组成及营养价值评价

Analysis of amino acid composition and nutritional value in different growth stages of Silphium perfoliatum L.

  • 摘要: 为了研究不同生长期(现蕾期、开花期、结实期)串叶松香草的氨基酸组成及营养价值,试验在同一地的前、中、后区域随机刈割现蕾期、开花期、结实期串叶松香草各10株,烘干粉碎过60目筛,采用盐酸水解法和高效液相色谱(HPLC)法测定不同生长期串叶松香草苯丙氨酸、苏氨酸、缬氨酸、丙氨酸、酪氨酸、赖氨酸、亮氨酸、谷氨酸、甘氨酸、丝氨酸、精氨酸、异亮氨酸、天冬氨酸、脯氨酸、组氨酸、胱氨酸、蛋氨酸17种氨基酸含量,采用联合国粮食组织/世界卫生组织(FAO/WHO)必需氨基酸模式计算氨基酸评分(AAS)、必需氨基酸比值系数(RC)、必需氨基酸比值系数评分(SRC)和必需氨基酸指数(EAAI),综合评价不同生长期串叶松香草的营养价值。结果表明:不同生长期的串叶松香草中均检测到17种氨基酸。现蕾期与结实期氨基酸中除精氨酸、异亮氨酸、天冬氨酸、脯氨酸差异显著(P<0.05)外,其他氨基酸差异均不显著(P>0.05)。开花期与现蕾期、结实期相比,除组氨酸、异亮氨酸(结实期)、胱氨酸、蛋氨酸、天冬氨酸(现蕾期)差异不显著外(P>0.05),其他氨基酸之间均呈极显著差异(P<0.05)。现蕾期、结实期总氨基酸含量比开花期分别高49.48%(P<0.01)、29.48%(P<0.01),必需氨基酸总量分别高48.80%(P<0.01)、34.94%(P<0.01),药效氨基酸总量分别高47.84%(P<0.01)、46.67%(P<0.01),甜味氨基酸总量分别高57.69%(P<0.01)、11.06%(P>0.05),酸鲜味氨基酸总量分别高35.63%(P<0.01)、59.77%(P<0.01),苦味氨酸总量分别高52.63%(P<0.01)、42.11%(P<0.01)。现蕾期必需氨基酸总量/总氨基酸含量和必需氨基酸总量/非必需氨基酸总量接近FAO/WHO必需氨基酸模式,甜味氨基酸总量最高(3.28%),SRC为72.18,EAAI为0.86,达到良好蛋白质的标准。串叶松香草第一限制氨基酸为赖氨酸。说明现蕾期串叶松香草氨基酸种类齐全,总氨基酸含量较高,必需氨基酸相对均衡合理,甜味氨基酸、酸鲜氨基酸、药效氨基酸含量高,表现出了较高的饲用价值。

     

    Abstract: The aim of this study was to study the amino acid composition and nutritional value in different growth stages(squaring stage, flowering stage and grain-filling stage) of Silphium perfoliatum L..Ten plants were randomly selected in the front, middle and back areas of the same plot in the squaring, flowering and grain-filling stage of Silphium perfoliatum L.. After mowing, the samples were heated and smashed to pass through a screen of 60 meshes. The contents of 17 kinds of amino acids(phenylalanine, threonine, valine, alanine, tyrosine, lysine, leucine, glutamic acid, glycine, serine, arginine, isoleucine, aspartic acid, proline, histidine, cystine, methionine) were determined by HPLC in different growth stages of Silphium perfoliatum L.. The amino acid score(AAS), essential amino acid ratio coefficient(RC), essential amino acid ratio coefficient score(SRC) and essential amino acid index(EAAI) were measured by FAO/WHO essential amino acid pattern to evaluate the nutritional value in different growth stages of Silphium perfoliatum L.. The results showed that 17 amino acids were detected in different growth stages. There were no significant differences in the amino acids(P>0.05) between squaring stage and grain-filling stage except for arginine, isoleucine, aspartic acid, proline(P<0.05). The differences of amino acids were significant(P<0.05) at flowering stage compared to squaring stage and grain-filling stage, except for histidine, isoleucine(grain-filling stage), cystine, methionine, aspartic acid(squaring state), which were not significantly different(P>0.05). The contents of total amino acid were 49.48%(P<0.01) and 29.48%(P<0.01) higher in squaring stage and grain-filling stage than in flowering stage, the contents of essential amino acids were 48.80%(P<0.01) and 33.94%(P<0.01) higher, the contents of drug-effective amino acids were 47.84%(P<0.01) and 46.67%(P<0.01) higher, the contents of sweet amino acids were 57.69%(P<0.01) and 11.06%(P>0.05) higher, the contents of fresh amino acids were 35.63%(P<0.01) and 59.77%(P<0.01) higher, the contents of bitter amino acids were 52.63%(P<0.01) and 42.11%(P>0.05) higher. The values of total essential amino acids/total amino acids and total essential amino acids/total non-essential amino acids were close to the essential amino acid pattern recommended by FAO/WHO at the squaring stage. The highest content of sweet aminoacids was 3.28%, the SRC was 72.18, and the EAAI value was 0.86 at the squaring stage, which reached the standard of good protein source. Lysine was the first limiting amino acid of Silphium perfoliatum L..The results indicated that the amino acids of Silphium perfoliatum L. at the squaring stage were complete, the content of total amino acids was high, and the essential amino acids were relatively balanced and reasonable. It had high content of sweet, sour, and drug-effective amino acids, and had certain medicinal value.

     

/

返回文章
返回