高级检索+

鸭疫里默氏杆菌的分离鉴定及不同感染途径对肉鸭致病性研究

Isolation and identification of Riemerella anatipestifer and study on its pathogenicity in meat ducks by different infection routes

  • 摘要: 为了探究鸭疫里默氏杆菌(RA)不同感染途径对肉鸭的致病性,试验首先从临床疑似RA感染的发病及死淘肉鸭的脑、心脏和肝脏组织中分离细菌;然后通过形态特征观察、镜检和生化特性分析对分离菌株进行初步鉴定,通过PCR鉴定和玻片凝集试验进一步确定分离菌株的菌种和血清型;最后进行致病性试验,将100只21日龄健康樱桃谷肉鸭分为5组饮水组(模拟饮水感染)、肌肉注射组(模拟皮肤伤口感染)、喷雾组(模拟呼吸道感染)、接触组(模拟接触感染)及对照组,每组20只,分别饲养于5个不同的生物安全型隔离器中,饮水组经口腔灌服菌液(1×10~7 cfu/只),肌肉注射组腿部肌肉注射菌液(1×10~7 cfu/只),喷雾组通过喷洒菌液的方式感染肉鸭(1×10~7 cfu/只),接触组通过接触的方式感染肉鸭(选取10只肉鸭腿部肌肉注射菌液1×10~7 cfu/只,不计入结果;另外10只不做处理,计入结果),对照组不做任何处理,10 d后统计各组的存活率和发病率,并对各组肉鸭进行病理剖检,观察病理特征。结果表明:经鉴定分离到1株6型RA。在致病性试验中,各组存活率的排序从低到高依次为肌肉注射组(20%)、饮水组(55%)、接触组(70%)、喷雾组(80%)和对照组(100%);饮水组、肌肉注射组、喷雾组和接触组的存活率显著低于对照组(P<0.05),肌肉注射组的存活率显著低于饮水组、喷雾组和接触组(P<0.05),而接触组、饮水组和喷雾组的存活率差异不显著(P>0.05)。各组发病率的排序从高到低依次为肌肉注射组(100%)、饮水组(95%)、喷雾组(85%)、接触组(60%)和对照组(0);饮水组、肌肉注射组、喷雾组和接触组肉鸭的发病率显著高于对照组(P<0.05),肌肉注射组、饮水组、喷雾组之间差异不显著(P>0.05),喷雾组和接触组之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。对照组肉鸭心脏和肝脏正常,其他4组表现为不同程度的心包炎、肝周炎和气囊炎;其中饮水组、肌肉注射组和接触组的纤维性渗出物较少,尤其接触组,仅心包有少量纤维素性渗出物;而喷雾组心包和肝脏的纤维素性渗出物最多,心脏和肝脏部位形成了较厚的渗出性包膜。说明临床分离的6型RA菌株可通过饮水、皮肤伤口、呼吸道、接触四种途径感染肉鸭,其中皮肤伤口感染对肉鸭的致病性最强,引起的死亡率最高;而呼吸道感染肉鸭的病理特征最为明显,可引起严重的心包炎和肝周炎。

     

    Abstract: In order to investigate the pathogenicity of different infection routes of Riemerella anatipestifer(RA) in meat ducks, in this experiment, firstly, the bacteria were isolated from the brain, heart and liver tissues of clinically RA-suspected infected and dead ducks. Then, the isolated strains were preliminarily identified by morphological characteristics observation, microscopic examination and biochemical characteristics analysis, and the species and serotypes of the isolated strains were further determined by PCR identification and slide agglutination test. Finally, pathogenicity test was performed. The 100 21-day-old healthy Cherry Valley ducks were divided into 5 groups,(drinking group simulated drinking water infection, intramuscular injection group simulated skin wound infection, spray group simulated respiratory infection, contact group simulated contact infection and the control group); with 20 ducks in each group; they were stocked in 5 different biosafety isolators, respectively. The drinking group was infected with oral bacteria solution for infection(1×10~7 cfu/head);the intramuscular injection group was injected with bacteria solution at leg muscle for infection(1×10~7 cfu/head); the spray group was infected with spraying bacteria solution for infection(1×10~7 cfu/head); the contact group was infected by contact for infection(10 meat ducks were selected for intramuscular injection of bacteria solution, 1×10~7 cfu/head, not account for results; and the other 10 were not treated, account for results), and no treatment was done in the control group. After 10 days, the survival rate and incidence of each group were counted, and all meat ducks were pathologically autopsied and the pathological features were observed. The results showed that one strain of type 6 RA was identified and isolated. In the pathogenicity test, the survival rates of each group were ranked from low to high as intramuscular injection group(20%), drinking water group(55%), contact group(70%), spray group(80%), and the control group(100%). The survival rates of the drinking group, intramuscular injection group, spray group and contact group were significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05), and the survival rate of the intramuscular injection group was significantly lower than those in the drinking water group, spray group and contact group(P<0.05), while the survival rates of the contact group, drinking water group and spray group were not significant(P>0.05). The incidences of each group were sorted from high to low as intramuscular injection group(100%), drinking water group(95%), spray group(85%), contact group(60%) and control group(0). The incidence rates of meat ducks in drinking water group, intramuscular injection group, spray group and contact group were significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between intramuscular injection group, drinking water group and spray group(P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the spray group and the contact group(P>0.05). The heart and liver of the meat duck in the control group were normal, and the other 4 groups showed varying degrees of pericarditis, perihepatitis and balloonitis. Among them, there was less fibrous exudate in the drinking water group, the intramuscular injection group and the contact group; especially in the contact group, that was only a small amount of fibrinous exudate in the pericardium. In the spray group, the pericardium and liver had the most fibrinous exudation, and thicker exudative envelopes formed in the heart and liver. These results indicated that the isolates of type 6 RA strain could infect ducks through drinking water, skin wound, respiratory tract and contact, among which skin wound infection was the most pathogenic to ducks and caused the highest mortality. The pathological features of respiratory tract infection in meat ducks were the most obvious, which could cause serious pericarditis and perihepatic inflammation.

     

/

返回文章
返回