高级检索+

基于COⅠ、16S rRNA &18S rRNA基因的蚱亚科部分种类分子系统发育分析

The Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Some Species of Tetriginae Based on COⅠ, 16S rRNA & 18S rRNA Genes

  • 摘要: 本研究扩增和测定了蚱亚科9属30种昆虫的COⅠ、16S rRNA和18S rRNA基因,对联合序列的碱基组成和种间遗传距离进行了分析,同时采用最大似然法(maximum likelihood method, ML)和贝叶斯法(bayesian inference method, BI)构建了分子系统发育关系。结果表明:(1)从遗传距离分析上看,30种蚱类的种间遗传距离范围很小,在0至0.134之间。其中粗股蚱(Tetrix grossifemura)和断隆蚱(Tetrix interrupta)的遗传距离为0,齿股版纳蚱(Bannatettix serrifemoralis)和拟齿股突眼蚱(Ergatettix serrifemoroides)的遗传距离为0.001,它们是同物异名的物种。此外,拟齿股突眼蚱(Ergatettix serrifemoroides)和粗股蚱(Tetrix grossifemura)、拟齿股突眼蚱(Ergatettix serrifemoroides)和断隆蚱(Tetrix interrupta)的遗传距离均为0.005;齿股版纳蚱(Bannatettix serrifemoralis)和粗股蚱(Tetrix grossifemur),齿股版纳蚱(Bannatettix serrifemoralis)和断隆蚱(Tetrix interrupta),短背尖顶蚱(Teredorus brachinota)和武夷山尖顶蚱(Teredorus wuyishanensis),它们之间的遗传距离均为0.006,这些种之间同样存在同物异名的可能。(2)从分子系统发育水平上,仅支持尖顶蚱属(Teredorus)为单系群,不支持悠背蚱属(Euparatettix)、蚱属(Tetrix)、突眼蚱属(Ergatettix)、版纳蚱属(Bannatettix)、柯蚱属(Coptotettix)、庭蚱属(Hedotettix)、台蚱属(Formosatettix)和微翅蚱属(Alulatettix)现行的分类系统。另外,本文从形态分类学的角度分析了分子系统发育水平上不支持蚱亚科现行的分类系统的主要原因。本研究结果将为蚱总科昆虫进行深入的分类修订研究提供科学参考。

     

    Abstract: In this study, the COⅠ, 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA genes from 30 species in 9 genera within Tetriginae were amplified and sequenced. The base composition and interspecies genetic distance of the combined sequence of COⅠ, 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA genes, and the molecular phylogenetic relationships were reconstru-cted using maximum likelihood(ML) and bayesian inference(BI) methods. The main results were as follows:(1) The genetic distances of 30 Tetriginae species ranged from 0 to 0.134. Among them, the genetic distance between Tetrix grossifemura and Tetrix interrupta was 0, and the genetic distance between Bannatettix serrifemoralis and Ergatettix serrifemoroides was 0.001. So Tetrix grossifemura and Tetrix interrupta, Bannatettix serrifemoralis and Ergatettix serrifemoroides were synonymy. In addition, the genetic distance between Ergatettix serrifemoroides and Tetrix grossifemura, Ergatettix serrifemoroides and Tetrix interrupta were 0.005; and the genetic distance between Bannatettix serrifemoralis and Tetrix grossifemur, Bannatettix serrifemoralis and Tetrix interrupta, Teredorus brachinota and Teredorus wuyishanensis were 0.006, they may also be synonymy.(2) The research supported the monophyletic of Teredorus and did not support the monophyletic of Euparatettix, Tetrix, Ergatettix, Bannatettix, Coptotettix, Hedotettix, Formosatettix, Alulatettix at the molecular phylogenetic level. In addition, the main reasons why the current taxonomy system of Tetriginae was not supported at the level of molecular phylogenetic were analyzed from the perspective of morphological taxonomy in this paper. This research will provides a scientific reference for the in-depth classification and revision of Tetrigoidea.

     

/

返回文章
返回