高级检索+

基于混合效应建模方法和机载LiDAR数据的杉木胸径预测

Prediction of Individual Tree Diameter of Chinese Fir Based on Mixed-Effects Modeling Approach and Airborne LiDAR Data

  • 摘要:
    目的 机载激光雷达(LiDAR)是大尺度获取森林结构参数的关键技术。为提升单木胸径(DBH)的遥感估算精度,本研究基于LiDAR数据,构建并验证一种可解释区域与样地差异的嵌套混合效应模型。
    方法 在广东省乐昌、英德、和平、连山、龙门、始兴和郁南7个县(市)的杉木人工林中共设置133块30 m × 30 m样地。同步获取地面每木检尺数据与LiDAR点云数据,提取单木树冠投影面积(CA)、树高(LH)及林分郁闭度(SCD)作为预测变量。以CA为自变量构建基础线性模型,进而构建以地区和样地为随机效应的嵌套两水平混合效应模型。采用“留一样地”交叉验证法评估模型,并比较4种抽样策略(随机、中等、最大和最小)对预测精度的影响。
    结果 冠形因子中,CA与胸径的线性关系最稳定,被确定为最佳基础变量。引入地区和样地随机效应后,胸径的嵌套两水平混合效应模型拟合精度显著提升;当随机效应同时作用于参数abc时,模型表现最好,相比基础模型均方根误差(RMSE)降低13.15%。交叉验证表明,RMSE与总相对误差(TRE)均随抽样株数增加而递减,随机抽样策略效果最佳。
    结论 嵌套两水平混合效应模型可有效反演中国南部杉木人工林单木胸径。兼顾测量成本与预测误差,建议在实际调查中随机抽取3株样木估计随机效应,该方法为区域尺度森林参数的精准监测提供了可靠技术途径。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Airborne LiDAR has become a core technology for large-scale estimation of tree- and stand-level attributes due to its high spatial resolution. Incorporating LiDAR-derived variables into mixed-effects models can further enhance the accuracy of individual-tree diameter at breast height (DBH) estimation.
    Method The study was conducted across seven counties/cities in Guangdong Province—Lechang, Yingde, Heping, Lianshan, Longmen, Shixing and Yunan—where 133 pure Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation plots (30 m × 30 m) were established. Field-measured tree measurements were integrated with synchronously acquired airborne LiDAR point clouds to extract crown projection area (CA), height (LH) and stand canopy density (SCD) as predictors. A basic linear model using CA alone was first constructed, followed by a two-level nested mixed-effects model with region and plot treated as random effects. Model validation was performed via leave-one-plot-out cross-validation, and the impacts of four sampling strategies (random, median, largest and smallest tree) on prediction accuracy were compared.
    Result Among crown-shape variables, CA was highly correlated with crown diameter (CD) and crown volume (CV). Nevertheless, the linear model using CA alone provided the best fit and was selected as the base model. Incorporating random effects for region and plot markedly improved DBH estimation. The optimal model specification included random effects on parameters a, b and c, resulting in a 13.15% reduction in root-mean-square error (RMSE) compared with the base model. Cross-validation results indicated that both RMSE and total relative error (TRE) decreased as the number of sample trees used for local calibration increased. The random sampling strategy yielded the best overall performance.
    Conclusion The developed two-level nested mixed-effects model provides and effective approach for estimating individual-tree DBH in Chinese fir plantations across southern China. Considering the trade-off between survey cost and prediction accuracy, randomly selecting three sample trees per plot is recommended for estimating random effects in operational inventories.

     

/

返回文章
返回