高级检索+

不同生长状态榆树水力特征和非结构性碳的差异

Differences in Hydraulic Characteristics and Non-structural Carbon of Elm Trees in Different Growth States

  • 摘要:
    目的 厘清导致榆树衰退死亡的生理生态学机制。
    方法 通过测定健康、衰退和濒死榆树叶片性状、水力性状和非结构性碳(NSC)之间的差异,分析导致其衰退的关键因子并量化其相对重要性,确定水力障碍和碳饥饿在榆树衰退过程中的作用。
    结果 濒死榆树10~40 cm土壤水分显著低于健康榆树。濒死榆树叶面积和C:N显著低于健康榆树,而叶密度和比叶质量显著增加,表明其采取保守策略来适应干旱。濒死榆树的中午枝条和叶片水势分别比健康榆树下降了36.92%和40.51%,而枝条栓塞程度(PLC)增加了59.35%,差异显著。濒死榆树可溶性糖和NSC显著低于健康榆树,尤其是枝条、树干和根中淀粉含量分别下降了27.59%、31.30%和31.33%,表明濒死榆树动用储备淀粉来维持生存。量化结果显示,PLC、中层土壤水分和中午叶片水势是导致榆树衰退死亡的关键因素,淀粉相对贡献率为8.92%,也是重要因素之一。
    结论 水力衰竭是导致榆树衰退的首要因素,树干和树根中非结构性碳浓度下降加剧其衰退。研究结果有助于阐明导致三北地区榆树衰退死亡的生理生态学机制,为该地区树种选择、防护林营建和林分结构优化提供科学依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective This study aimed to elucidate the physiological and ecological mechanisms underlying decline and mortality of elm (Ulmus pumila L.) trees.
    Method Differences in leaf traits, hydraulic traits, and non-structural carbon (NSC) were measured among healthy, declining, and dying trees. Based on these data, the key factors driving elm trees decline were identified and quantified their relative importance.
    Result Soil water content at 10~40 cm depth around dying trees was significantly lower than that around healthy trees. Dying trees exhibited significantly reduced leaf area and lower C:N ratio, but higher leaf density and leaf mass per area, indicating a shift toward a conservative resource-use strategy under drought stress. Midday water potential in branches and leaves of dying trees decreased by 36.92% and 40.51%, respectively, compared with healthy trees, while the percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity (PLC) of the branches increased by 59.35%, with significant differences. Additionally, levels of soluble sugars and NSC in dying trees were markedly lower than in healthy ones, particularly starch content in branches, trunks, and roots decreased by 27.59%, 31.30%, and 31.33%, respectively, suggesting that dying trees mobilized stored starch reserves to maintain survival. Quantitative analyses identified PLC, mid-layer soil moisture, and midday leaf water potential as the primary factors driving elm trees decline and mortality. Starch contributed 8.92%, indicating that carbon reserves also play an important role.
    Conclusion Overall, hydraulic failure is the primary driver of elm trees decline, while depletion of NSC in stems and roots exacerbates deterioration. These findings clarify the physiological and ecological mechanisms leading to elm trees decline in the Three-North regions, providing a scientific basis for species selection, shelterbelt construction, and forest structure optimization in the region.

     

/

返回文章
返回