高级检索+

祁连山东部高寒山区林下植被多样性的驱动因素

Drivers of Understory Vegetation Species Diversity in Alpine Forests of the Eastern Qilian Mountains

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨在高寒森林系统中,地形因素、林分结构和土壤养分如何驱动林下植被多样性,以及这种驱动作用在灌木层与草本层是否存在显著层级分异。
    方法 以祁连山东部天然次生林为研究对象,在2 700~3 100 m海拔梯度及多种地形条件下设置64个样地,系统测定林分结构、土壤理化性质(pH、有机碳、全氮、碱解氮、速效钾、含水量等)以及地形因子(海拔、坡度)。计算Margalef丰富度指数、Simpson多样性指数、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数与Pielou均匀度4种多样性指数,并使用冗余分析(RDA)、线性混合模型(LMM)与方差分解(VPA)综合分析灌草层多样性的驱动机制。
    结果 研究区林下植被多样性整体表现为草本层高于灌木层,不同沟谷间差异明显,其中祁汉沟灌木层多样性最高,塔藏沟草本层多样性最高,LMM与VPA结果表明,海拔是影响林下植被多样性的主导因子,分别独立解释灌木层和草本层多样性变异的22.74%和16.31%。灌木层多样性主要受土壤因子驱动,同时地形与土壤因子呈相对独立作用,且沟谷随机效应显著(ICC=24%)。相比之下,草本层多样性主要受地形与林分结构的交互作用影响(12.31%),土壤因子解释度较低(4.63%)且与其他因子无交集。此外,草本层多样性沿坡度呈显著单峰变化,约在25°时达到最大,而灌木层与坡度之间未表现出显著关系。
    结论 高寒山区林下植被多样性格局呈现出显著的层级分异特征,其中草本层主要受地形通过影响林分结构进而调控林下光环境的级联作用驱动,而灌木层则主要受地形条件下土壤养分供给及资源竞争过程的共同影响。研究可为高寒森林生态系统的近自然经营与生物多样性保护提供科学依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective This study aimed to investigate how topographic factors, stand structure, and soil nutrients drive understory vegetation diversity in alpine forest ecosystems, and to determine whether these driving mechanisms exhibit significant stratified differentiation between the shrub and herb layers.
    Methods Based on the natural secondary forests in the eastern Qilian Mountains, a total of 64 plots were established across an elevational gradient of 2 700~3 100 m and across different topographic conditions. Stand structural characteristics, soil physicochemical properties (including pH, soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, available potassium, and soil moisture content), and topographic variables (elevation and slope) were systematically measured. Four diversity indices, namely the Margalef richness index, Simpson diversity index, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, and Pielou evenness index, were calculated. Redundancy analysis (RDA), linear mixed-effects models (LMM), and variance partitioning analysis (VPA) were employed to comprehensively reveal the driving mechanisms underlying diversity patterns in the shrub and herb layers.
    Results Understory vegetation diversity was generally higher in the herb layer than in the shrub layer, with pronounced differences among valleys. Shrub-layer diversity was highest in Qihan Gully, whereas herb-layer diversity reached its maximum in Tacang Gully. Results from the LMM and VPA indicated that elevation was the dominant factor affecting understory vegetation diversity, independently explaining 22.74% and 16.31% of the variation in shrub- and herb-layer diversity, respectively. Shrub-layer diversity was primarily driven by soil factors, while topographic and soil factors exerted relatively independent effects. In addition, the random effect of valley was significant (ICC = 24%). In contrast, herb-layer diversity was mainly influenced by the interaction between topography and stand structure, which explained 12.31% of the observed variation. Soil factors made a relatively small contribution, explaining only 4.63% of the variation, and showed no shared explanatory effect with other factor groups. Furthermore, herb-layer diversity exhibited a significant unimodal relationship with slope, reaching its maximum at approximately 25°, whereas no significant relationship was detected between shrub-layer diversity and slope.
    Conclusion Understory vegetation diversity in alpine mountainous regions exhibits pronounced stratified differentiation. Herb-layer diversity is mainly regulated by cascading effects of topography through stand structure, and the associated understory light environment. In contrast, shrub-layer diversity is mainly controlled by the combined effects of soil nutrient availability and resource competition under varying topographic conditions. These findings provide a scientific basis for close-to-nature forest management and biodiversity conservation in alpine forest ecosystems.

     

/

返回文章
返回