高级检索+

不同初植密度的桉树人工林经济效益分析

Econom ic Ana lysis of Euca lypt Planta tion with D ifferent In itia l Spac ing

  • 摘要: 通过分析1993年设立于广西东门林场的桉树人工林5种造林密度(1) 2222株·hm-2、(2) 1 667株·hm-2、(3) 1 250株·hm-2、(4) 883株·hm-2和(5) 667株·hm-2 12年的生长数据,计算了连年生长量、平均生长量、材种出材量、净现值和内部收益率。结果显示, 6. 3 a前5种密度蓄积生长量的差距达到极显著水平, 8. 3 a以后差异就不再显著;密度2222株·hm-2、1 667株·hm-2和1 250株·hm-2的数量成熟均为6 a,密度883株·hm-2为6. 5a,密度667株·hm-2为7 a;造林密度越大,纸浆材的出材比例越高,而大、中径材出材比例越小,造林密度小,锯材和旋切材的出材比例更高;密度2 222株·hm-2、1 667株·hm-2、1 250株·hm-2、883株·hm-2和667株·hm-2的轮伐期分别为6 a、7 a、7 a、7 a和8 a,这时的净现值分别是17 661、18 457、22 257、24 755和24 007元·hm-2 ,内部收益率分别为56%、50%、55%、58%和51%;密度883株·hm-2有最高的净现值和内部收益率,是5种密度中最好的造林密度,其他从大到小的顺序是密度667株·hm-2、1 250株·hm-2、1 667株·hm-2和2 222株·hm-2。

     

    Abstract: The spacing trial with 5 treatments ( 1 ) 2 222 tree ·hm-2 , ( 2 ) 1 667 tree ·hm-2 , ( 3 ) 1 250 tree ·hm-2 , (4) 883 tree·hm-2 and (5) 667 tree·hm-2was established at Guangxi Dongmen Forest Farm in 1993, thegrowth data were collected up to 12 years old and calculated CA I, MA I, Volume with different top diameter, NPVand IRR. The results showed that the volume growth of 5 spacings were high significant up to 6. 3 yrs, not significant from 8. 3 yrs. The age of quantitative maturity of spacing 2 222 tree·hm-2 , 1 667 tree·hm-2 and 1 250 tree·hm-2 was 6 yrs, 6. 5 yrs for spacing 883 tree·hm-2 and 7 yrs for spacing 667 tree·hm-2. The denser the initial spacingwas, the more the amount of small diameter timber and the less the big diameter timber. The harvest rotations of spacing 2 222 tree·hm-2 , 1 667 tree·hm-2 , 1 250 tree·hm-2 , 883 tree·hm-2 and 667 tree·hm-2were 6 yrs, 7 yrs, 7 yrs, 7 yrs and 8 yrs respectively, the NPV were 17 661、18 457、22 257、24 755 and 24 007 RMB·hm-2 respectively and IRR were 56%, 50%, 55% , 58% and 51% respectively. Spacing 883 tree·hm-2 had themost NPV and IRR among the 5 spacing treatments, the rest in the order from high to low were 667 tree·hm-2 ,1 250 tree·hm-2 , 1 667 tree·hm-2 and 2 222 tree·hm-2.

     

/

返回文章
返回