高级检索+

BCI 50 hm2森林大样地2010年活立木空间结构分析

Research on Spatial Structure of 50 hm2 Forest Plot at Barro Colorado Island in 2010

  • 摘要:
    目的 以BCI 50 hm2大样地为研究对象,利用空间结构参数一元分布和二元分布,量化评价BCI 50 hm2大样地活立木整体、冠层和下层的空间结构特征。
    方法 以巴拿马BCI 50 hm2森林大样地(2010年第7次调查)中所有胸径(DBH)≥ 1 cm的活立木数据为材料,采用基于相邻木关系的空间结构参数方法对其整体、冠层和下层活立木的空间结构进行分析。
    结果 表明:BCI大样地第7次调查整体活立木的平均角尺度(W)为0.504,样地大部分林木处于极强度混交状态(Mi=1),比例为74.7%。样地的冠层和下层的状态与整体林分的状态相同,均处于随机分布、强度混交和中庸偏劣势的状态。冠层中几乎没有林木个体处于零度混交(Mi=0)状态。下层的大部分林木处于中高度大小比数和中高度混交度等级的组合上。样地中大部分活立木为小径级个体(1 cm≤DBH<20 cm),使得样地中大部分林木处于劣势状态。无论在整体、冠层和下层,活立木的混交度(Mi)都处于极高水平,在参照树周围的最近4株相邻木中同种个体的比例(Mi=0.00,Mi=0.25)极低。
    结论 BCI大样地整体、冠层和下层活立木空间结构呈随机分布,林木的混交度极高,样地中同种个体在最近4株邻体这样的小尺度上呈现聚集分布的情况几乎不存在。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To study the forest spatial structure of the permanent 50-ha forest dynamics project plot on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama.
    Method The seventh censuses (2010) of stems ≥ 1 cm DBH alive trees data of BCI plot was analyzed by the neighborhood-based variables of forest spatial structure, and the spatial structure of canopy trees and understory trees were compared.
    Result The pattern of live trees followed a random distribution (W=0.504) in the whole plot, 74.7% of the live trees in the state of high mingling degree, few individuals in the status of low mingling degree (Mi=0). Most of understory trees were in higher dominance degree and superior status of mingling. Large numbers of individuals in the plot were small trees (1 cm ≤ DBH < 20 cm), to this degree, they were in a status of disadvantage and belonged to inferior trees.Regardless live trees in the whole plot, the canopy or the understory, almost all individuals were in superior mingling status. At the scale of four neighboring trees around the reference tree within the whole plot, the ratio of conspecific neighbor trees (Mi=0, Wi=0.25) closed to zero. This indicated that the aggregate distribution of conspecific individuals in such a small scale was non-existence.
    Conclusion The forest was in a state of high mingling.More than half of the trees in the plot followed a random pattern, the trees with different dominance degrees had a similar frequency. It is suggested that the aggregate distribution of conspecific individuals in such a small scale (four neighboring trees around the reference tree) is non-existence.

     

/

返回文章
返回