芦苇秸秆厌氧联产氢气甲烷过程中细菌群落演替规律

贾璇; 任连海; 李鸣晓; 席北斗; 祝超伟; 赵由才

doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.04.028

芦苇秸秆厌氧联产氢气甲烷过程中细菌群落演替规律

1.
北京工商大学环境科学与工程系，北京 100048
2.
中国环境科学研究院环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室，北京 100012
3.
同济大学污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室，上海 200092

基金项目: 十二五国家科技支撑计划（2014BAL02B05）

计量
- 文章访问数: 2732
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 894
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-06-08
- 修回日期: 2015-12-28
- 发布日期: 2016-02-14

Bacterial community structure succession in fermentative biohydrogen with methanogenesis integration from reed straw

1.
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

摘要

摘要: 基于PCR-DGGE技术研究芦苇秸秆氢气-甲烷厌氧联产过程中，细菌微生物群落结构特征和演替规律。结果表明，厌氧联产过程中细菌群落结构分布存在明显的阶段性差异。产氢阶段初期，细菌群落相似性较小，随着厌氧联产的进行，细菌种类逐渐增多并在产氢高峰期保持稳定，群落相似性较高，戴斯系数（Cs）为83.6%（第12、24小时，泳道H3和H4）。产甲烷高峰期Cs值达到87.4%（第210、258小时，泳道M6，M7），群落结构稳定，产甲烷末期Cs值降低至51.5%（第210、432小时，泳道M6，M9）。序列分析表明，Enterobacter aerogenes产气肠杆菌是具有高效产氢潜力的兼性厌氧细菌，Sedimentibacter产氢产乙酸菌是产氢阶段的优势微生物。Clostridium thermocellum嗜热纤维素菌是厌氧联产过程的优势微生物，具有降解纤维素功能，对芦苇秸秆的能源化利用起到重要作用。
- 秸秆 /
- 细菌 /
- 氢气 /
- 甲烷 /
- 芦苇 /
- 群落演替
Abstract: Abstract: The two-stage coproduction of hydrogen and methane using cellulosic biomass, such as reed straw, is a promising technology for achieving energy saving and emission reduction and developing a circular economy. The enhancement of hydrogen and methane coproduction from reed straw under enzyme pretreatment was evaluated during anaerobic fermentation. The effects of cellulase pretreatment on biogas production performance and intermediate metabolites' characteristics were investigated in this study. In addition, the combination of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of 16S rRNA genes with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis was used to study the composition and succession of bacterial community in fermentative biohydrogen with methanogenesis integration system. The results showed that the maximum accumulative biogas production and hydrogen proportion were 42.5 mL/g and 52.1% respectively in hydrogenogenic stage. And the maximum accumulative biogas production of 137.5 mL/g was 5.36 times higher than the control in methane prodution stage. However, the highest methane proportion of 68.4% in control test was similar to those under cellulase pretreatment. Therefore, the cellulase pretreatment has the benefit of structural damage on refractory organics while improving the hydrogen production potential in this study. Usually, hydrogen and methane formation is accompanied by volatile fatty acids (VFAs) generation during anaerobic digestion process. Hence, the composition and concentration of soluble metabolites produced were useful indicators for monitoring the hydrogenogenic process. The investigation of the soluble metabolites at the end of each stage showed that the main VFAs were distributed under cellulase pretreatment compared with the control. The composition of VFAs in hydrogenogenic stage was butyric acid and acetic acid, indicating that butyric-acid type fermentation was established. During the methanogenic stage, the butyric acid was consumed and the propionic and valeric acid were produced more. These results showed that cellulase pretreatment might be attributed to the diversity of microbial populations in 2 stages after enrichment. The sequences of 16S rDNA DGGE predominant band fragments were determined by comparison with NCBI database. The DGGE patterns showed that the 2 stages experienced different microbial community structure changes during the period. Early in hydrogenogenic stage, the low similarity of bacterial communities was observed. And then the high similarity with Deiss coefficient of 83.6% (lane: H3, H4) and 87.4% (lane: M6, M7) was obtained in peak production period of hydrogen and methane, respectively. The Cs value was reduced to 51.5 at the end of methane production stage (lane: M6, M9). The majority of the sequences obtained were affiliated with Clostridium thermocellum (Band 20), Enterobacter aerogenes (Band 28) and Sedimentibacter (Band 29). In hydrogenogenic stage, the dominant microorganism was Enterobacter aerogenes (Band 28), which can produce hydrogen and dramatically enhance the hydrogen production performance. A hydrogen-producing acetogenic bacterium of Sedimentibacter (Band 29) was also the dominant bacterium, which can produce hydrogen and acetic acid in hydrogen and methane coproduction process. The dominant microorganism of Clostridium thermocellum (Band 20) existed in 2 stages, which can degrade cellulose and play an important role in reed straw utilization process. Hence, the maximum cumulative biogas yield and proportion were increased dramatically under the cellulase pretreatment, which directly impacted the hydrogen and methane production ability. The result provides an important microbiology theoretical basis for the biofortification in biogas coproduction process from cellulosic biomass.
- straw /
- bacteria /
- hydrogen /
- methane /
- reed /
- community succession

HTML全文

参考文献(30)

[1]	王萌，王玉彬，陈章和. 芦苇的种质资源及在人工湿地中的应用[J]. 应用与环境生物学报，2010，16(4)：590－595.Wang Meng, Wang Yubin, Chen Zhanghe. Germplasm resource of phragmites adans and its application in constructed wetlands[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2010, 16(4): 590－595. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	曹培培，刘茂松，唐金艳，等. 几种水生植物腐解过程的比较研究[J]. 生态学报，2014，34(14)：3848－3858.Cao Peipei, Liu Maosong, Tang Jinyan, et al. A comparative study on the decomposition processes among some aquatic plants[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(14): 3848－3858. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	朱静，吴亦红，李洪波，等. 白洋淀芦苇资源化利用技术及示范研究[J]. 环境科学与技术，2014，37(120)：92－94.Zhu Jing, Wu Yihong, Li Hongbo, et al. Study on the technology and demonstration of Baiyangdian reed resources utilization[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 37(120): 92－94. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	Xie B F, Cheng J, Zhou J H, et al. Cogeneration of hydrogen and methane from glucose to improve energy conversion efficiency[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(19): 5006－5011.
[5]	Zhao M X, Ruan W Q. Biogas performance from co-digestion of Taihu algae and kitchen wastes[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 75: 21－24.
[6]	Zhao M X, Ruan W Q. Improving hydrogen generation from kitchen wastes by microbial acetate tolerance response[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 77: 419－423.
[7]	Guwy A J, Dinsdale R M, Kim J R. Fermentative biohydrogen production systems integration [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(18): 8534－8542.
[8]	Li M X, Xia T M, Zhu C W, et al. Effect of short-time hydrothermal pretreatment of kitchen waste on biohydrogen production: Fluorescence spectroscopy coupled with parallel factor analysis[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 172: 382－390.
[9]	Jia X, Li M X, Xi B D, et al. Integration of fermentative biohydrogen with methanogenesis from fruit-vegetable waste using different pre-treatments[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 88: 1219－1227.
[10]	Birgitte K Ahring, Angelidaki I, E Conway de Macario, et al. Biometha-nation Ⅰ[M]. Berlin: Springer Heidelberg, 2003: 1－30.
[11]	Giovannoni S J, Britschgi T B, Moyer C L, et al. Genetic diversity in Sargasso Sea bacterioplankton[J]. Nature, 1990, 345(6270): 60－63.
[12]	Kim J, Lee S, Lee C. Comparative study of changes in reaction profile and microbial community structure in two anaerobic repeated-batch reactors started up with different seed sludges[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 129: 495－505.
[13]	陈法霖，张凯，郑华，等. PCR-DGGE技术解析针叶和阔叶凋落物混合分解对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报，2011，17(2)：145－150.Chen Falin, Zhang Kai, Zheng Hua, et al. Analyzing the effect of mixed decomposition of conifer and broadleaf litters on soil microbial communities by using PCR-DGGE[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2011, 17(2): 145－150. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	张振冬，王淑芬，曹宇. DGGE技术及其在海洋环境微生物多样性研究中的应用[J]. 海洋环境科学，2008，27(3)：297－300.Zhang Zhendong, Wang Shufen, Cao Yu. DGGE technique and its application in study on microbial diversity in marine environment[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2008, 27(3): 297－300. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	Hyun Min Jang, Sang Kyu Park, Jeong Hyub Ha, et al. Microbial community structure in a thermophilic aerobic digester used as a sludge pretreatment process for the mesophilic anaerobic digestion and the enhancement of methane production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 145: 80－89.
[16]	Richard M Myers, Stuart G Fischer, Leonard S Lerman, et al. Nearly all single base substitutions in DNA fragments joined to a GC-clamp can be detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1985, 13(9): 3131－3145.
[17]	张珍妮，吴晓芙，陈永华，等. DGGE技术在环境微生物多样性研究中的应用[J]. 生物技术通报，2009(12)：48－52.Zhang Zhenni, Wu Xiaofu, Chen Yonghua, et al. Application in research on microbial diversity of environment by DGGE technique[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2009(12): 48－52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	邢德峰，任南琪，宋业颖，等. DG-DGGE分析产氢发酵系统微生物群落动态及种群多样性[J]. 生态学报，2005，25(7)：1818－1823.Xing Defeng, Ren Nanqi, Song Yeying, et al. Application of DG-DGGE to analyze microbial community diversity and population dynamics in fermentative hydrogen-producing system[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(7): 1818－1823. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	宫曼丽，任南琪，邢德峰. DGGE/TGGE技术及其在微生物分子生态学中的应用[J]. 微生物学报，2004，44(6)：843－848.Gong Manli, Ren Nanqi, Xing Defeng. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis in microbial molecular ecology[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2004, 44(6): 843－848. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Daniela E Koeck, Vladimir V Zverlov, Wolfgang Liebl. Comparative genotyping of Clostridium thermocellum strains isolated from biogas plants: Genetic markers and characterization of cellulolytic potential[J]. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 2014, 37: 311－319.
[21]	王瑞兴，钱春香，袁晓明. 产气肠杆菌发酵产氢的批式放大试验研究[J]. 环境科学与技术，2013，36(11)：12－30.Wang Ruixing, Qian Chunxiang, Yuan Xiaoming. Scale-up batch fermentation of hydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes[J]. Environmental Science ＆Technology, 2013, 36(11): 12－30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	李建政，孙倩，刘枫，等. 一种产氢产乙酸菌互营共培养体的筛选及其群落结构解析[J]. 科技导报，2009，27(16): 78－82.
[23]	Juli an Carrillo-Reyes, Lourdes B. Celis, Felipe Alatriste-Mondragon. Strategies to cope with methanogens in hydrogen producing UASB reactors: Community dynamics[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 11423－11432.
[24]	Sandra I Maintinguer, Isabel K Sakamoto, M Angela T. Adorno. Bacterial diversity from environmental sample applied to bio-hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 3180－3190.
[25]	Nakakihara E, Ikemoto-Yamamoto R, Honda R. Effect of the addition of rice straw on microbial community in a sewage sludge digester[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2014, 70(5): 819－827.[26]Joonyeob Lee, Byungchul Hwang, Taewoan Koo. Temporal variation in methanogen communities of four different full-scale anaerobic digesters treating food[J]. Waste-recycling Wastewater, Bioresource Technology 2014, 168: 59－63.
[26]	Fumiaki Taguchi, Jun Danchang, Naoki Mizukami, et al. Isolation of a hydrogen-producing bacterium, Clostridium beijerinckii strain AM21B, from termites[J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1993, 39(7): 726－730.
[27]	Trevor Seelert, Dipankar Ghosh, Viviane Yargeau. Improving biohydrogen production using Clostridium beijerinckii immobilized with magnetite nanoparticles[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015, 99(9): 4107－4116.
[28]	Ana Paula Batista, Patrícia Moura, Paula A S S Marques, et al. Scenedesmus obliquusas feedstock for biohydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes and Clostridium butyricum[J]. Fuel, 2014, 117: 537－543.
[29]	Hu C C, Giannis A, Chen C L, et al. Comparative study of biohydrogen production by four dark fermentative bacteria[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38: 15686－15692.
[30]	夏玉，郑华，林捷，等. 屎肠球菌发酵特性及其功能性研究[J]. 食品工业科技，2014，35(12)：123－132.Xia Y, Zhen H, Lin J, et al. Study on the fermentation and function characteristics of Enterococcus Faecium[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, 35(12): 123－132. (in Chinese with English abstract)