高级检索+

半干旱草原型流域土壤水分变异及其影响因素分析

张璐, 朱仲元, 张圣微, 王慧敏

张璐, 朱仲元, 张圣微, 王慧敏. 半干旱草原型流域土壤水分变异及其影响因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(13): 124-132. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.13.015
引用本文: 张璐, 朱仲元, 张圣微, 王慧敏. 半干旱草原型流域土壤水分变异及其影响因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(13): 124-132. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.13.015
Zhang Lu, Zhu Zhongyuan, Zhang Shengwei, Wang Huimin. Analysis of soil moisture variation and its influencing factors in semi-arid steppe watershed[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(13): 124-132. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.13.015
Citation: Zhang Lu, Zhu Zhongyuan, Zhang Shengwei, Wang Huimin. Analysis of soil moisture variation and its influencing factors in semi-arid steppe watershed[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(13): 124-132. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.13.015

半干旱草原型流域土壤水分变异及其影响因素分析

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51779116);地区科学基金项目(51669018,51869015);内蒙古自然科学基金杰出青年培育基金(2019JQ06);中国科学院"西部之光"青年学者计划

Analysis of soil moisture variation and its influencing factors in semi-arid steppe watershed

  • 摘要: 土壤水分是岩石圈—生物圈—大气圈—水圈间水分循环的重要环节,是半干旱草原型流域植物生长的主要限制因子。该研究基于内蒙古锡林郭勒盟锡林河流域野外实测土壤水分数据,利用主成分分析和冗余分析等方法,对不同土壤类型垂直剖面土壤水分变化特征及其潜在环境影响因子进行了对比分析。结果表明,黑土、红砂土、栗钙土、盐土间土壤水分含量呈依次增大趋势;随着土层深度加深,土壤水分变异性减弱,且各层土壤水分变异性随时间变化受到土壤类型的影响较大;主成分分析表明海拔、植被高度和坡度等包含了解释土壤水分变异68.50%的信息;冗余分析识别出海拔和植被高度是土壤水分变异的关键潜在环境驱动因子。该研究可为半干旱草原型流域生态水文过程研究提供数据和理论支持。
    Abstract: Soil moisture is an important part of the lithosphere-biosphere-atmosphere-hydrosphere, and which is the main limiting factor for plant growth in watersheds of the semi-arid steppe as well. This study aimed to explore the characteristics of soil moisture variation and its potential environmental impact factors. This study had a significant effect on maintaining steppe ecosystem health, such as promoted the understanding of the eco-hydrological cycle of grassland and degraded grassland restoration. The Xilin River Basin located in the middle east of Inner Mongolia was chosen as the study area. The experiments had been performed in May 2019. Two meters of soil moisture detection tube was buried at each sampling point after removing the ground cover and floating soil. Besides, the soil moisture measurement depth was set from 0 cm to 180 cm. Soil moisture data were observed by using the Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) at 55 sampling points from July 22 to October 20 in 2019 after the soil layer was stabilized. Three replications were performed at each sample point. Such a soil survey was conducted within 3 days by twice a month in July and August, and once a month in the remaining months. Meanwhile, vegetation investigations were executed once a month, including vegetation height, vegetation coverage, and aboveground biomass. Besides, 3 original soil samples were brought back from the field for calibrating the TDR in the laboratory. It was indicated that the TDR was reliable with guaranteed that the soil moisture data used in the calibration formula was ranged from saturation to dryness completely. Based on the observed soil moisture and affiliated data in the field the characteristics of soil moisture changed in the vertical profiles, as well as its potential environmental impact factors were analyzed and compared among 4 soil types by using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Redundancy Analysis (RDA). The results indicated that the soil moisture in the Xilin River Basin was low overall. The changes in soil moisture at different soil depths over time were similar in kastanozems and arenosols while they had a great difference in solonchaks and phaeozems. Moreover, the soil moisture content of Phaeozems, Arenosols, Kastanozems, and Solonchaks increased sequentially of the basin. The variability of soil moisture in each layer was greatly affected by the soil type, and the variability weakens as the depth of the soil layer increases. At the same time, great differences in the variability of soil moisture among 4 soil types were found after the changes in soil moisture in different sampling periods were compared and analyzed. PCA indicated that 3 principal components containing information such as altitude, vegetation height, and slope, etc., which were sufficient to explain 68.50% of the soil moisture variation where PC1 and PC2 accounted for 40.00% and 15.60% respectively. In detail, the PC1 included altitude, potential evapotranspiration, air temperature, and vegetation coverage, and the PC2 integrated information of vegetation height and aboveground biomass, and the PC3 was slope and aspect. Consequently, the meteorological factors that affected soil moisture evaporation, vegetation factors, and slope and aspect factors were summarized as the main potential environmental impact factors of soil moisture variations in the Xilin River Basin. Altitude and vegetation height was defined as the key above-ground potential environmental factors driving the soil moisture variation by RDA. Meanwhile, the impact factors that affected soil moisture changes at different depths were different. The results of this study were conducive to understanding the soil moisture conditions and its distribution of different soil types in the Xilin River Basin, and also would provide data and theoretical support for the study of eco-hydrological processes in the semi-arid grassland watersheds.
  • [1] Liu Shuang, Gong Peng. Change of surface cover greenness in China between 2000 and 2010[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2012, 57(22): 2835-2845.
    [2] 黎明扬,刘廷玺,罗艳云,等. 半干旱草原型流域表层土壤饱和导水率传递函数及遥感反演研究[J]. 土壤学报,2019,56(1):90-100.Li Mingyang, Liu Tingxi, Luo Yanyun, et al. Pedo-transfer function and remote-sensing-based inversion saturated hydraulic conductivity of surface soil layer in Xilin River Basin[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2019, 56(1): 90-100. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [3] 张圣微,申芮,陈哲,等. 锡林郭勒草原植被生产力估算及其影响因素:以巴拉噶尔河流域为例[J]. 中国草地学报,2015,37(4):66-73.Zhang Shengwei, Shen Rui, Chen Zhe, et al. Estimation of vegetation productivity in Xilingol steppe and analysis of the influencing factors: A case study in Balgar River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2015, 37(4): 66-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [4] Baldwin D, Manfreda S, Keller K, et al. Predicting root zone soil moisture with soil properties and satellite near-surface moisture data across the conterminous United States[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 546: 393-404.
    [5] 李小雁. 水文土壤学面临的机遇与挑战[J]. 地球科学进展,2012,27(5):557-562.Li Xiaoyan. Opportunity and challenges for hydropedology[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2012, 27(5): 557-562. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [6] Fan Jiaqi, Xu Yan, Ge Haoyuan, et al. Vegetation growth variation in relation to topography in Horqin sandy land[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020. 113: 106215-106224.
    [7] 张阿龙,高瑞忠,刘廷玺,等. 高原内陆河流域气候水文突变与生态演变规律:以内蒙古锡林河和巴拉格尔河流域为例[J]. 中国环境科学,2019,39(12):5254-5263.Zhang Along, Gao Ruizhong, Liu Tingxi, et al. Identification on hydrometeorology mutation characteristics and ecological evolution pattern of the plateau inland river basin-taken Xilin river and Balager river of Inner Mongolia for instance[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019, 39(12): 5254-5263. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [8] Du Chuanli, Liu Xiaodong, Wu Wanli. CLM3-simulated soil moisture in East Asia and its possible response to global warming during 1979 through 2003[J]. Science in Cold and Arid Regions, 2009, 1(1): 51-58.
    [9] 郭欣欣,付强,卢贺,等. 东北黑土区农林混合利用坡面土壤水分空间异质性及主控因素[J]. 农业工程学报,2018,34(19):123-130.Guo Xinxin, Fu Qiang, Lu He, et al. Spatial variability and its controlling factors of soil moisture on cropland-forestland mixed hillslope in black soil area of Northeast China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2018, 34(19): 123-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [10] 王云强,邵明安,刘志鹏. 黄土高原区域尺度土壤水分空间变异性[J]. 水科学进展,2012,23(3):310-316.Wang Yunqiang, Shao Mingan, Liu Zhipeng. Spatial variability of soil moisture at the regional scale in the Loess Plateau[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2012, 23(3): 310-316. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [11] Choi M, Jacobs M. Spatial soil moisture scaling structure during soil moisture experiment 2005[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2011, 25(6): 926-932.
    [12] 李小雁. 干旱地区土壤-植被-水文耦合、响应与适应机制[J]. 中国科学:地球科学,2011,41(12):1721-1730.Li Xiaoyan. Soil-vegetation-hydrological coupling, response and adaptation mechanism in arid areas[J]. Science in China: Earth Science, 2011, 41(12): 1721-1730. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [13] 侯琼,沈建国,乌兰巴特尔. 典型草原区土壤水分变化特征及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报,2005,20(6):42-48.Hou Qiong, Shen Jianguo, Ulaan Baatar. Analysis of soil moisture characteristics and influencing factors in typical grassland areas[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2005, 20(6): 42-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [14] A Yinglan, Wang Guoqiang, Liu Tingxi, et al. Spatial variation of correlations between vertical soil water and evapotranspiration and their controlling factors in a semi-arid region[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 574: 53-63.
    [15] Jian Shengqi, Zhao Chuanyan, Fang Shumin, et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration on soil water storage and water balance in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2015, 206: 85-96.
    [16] Blyth E M, Finch J, Robinson M, et al. Can soil moisture be mapped onto the terrain?[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2004, 8(5): 923-930.
    [17] Seneviratne S I, Corti T, Davin E L, et al. Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 2010, 99(3/4): 125-161.
    [18] 赵燕东,高超,刘卫平,等. 基于相位检测的高盐碱与高有机土壤水分传感器研究[J]. 农业机械学报,2015,46(9):151-158.Zhao Yandong, Gao Chao, Liu Weiping, et al. Study of moisture sensor for high saline-alkali soil and high organic soil based on phase detection[J]. Transaction of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(9): 151-158. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [19] Albertson J D, Kiely G, On the structure of soil moisture time series in the context of land surface models[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 243(1/2): 101-119.
    [20] 郭焘. 锡林郭勒草原土壤含水量分布特征研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学,2018.Guo Tao. Study on Distribution Characteristics of Soil Water Content in Xilingol Grassland[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Normal University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [21] 何其华,何永华,包维楷. 干旱半干旱区山地土壤水分动态变化[J]. 山地学报,2003,21(2):149-156.He Qihua, He Yonghua, Bao Weikai. Research on dynamics of soil moisture in arid and semiarid mountainous areas[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2003, 21(2): 149-156. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [22] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, Irrigation and Drainage Paper NO.56[M]. Rome, Italy Allen: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 1998.
    [23] 席小康,朱仲元,郝祥云. 锡林河流域草原植物群落分类及其多样性分析[J]. 生态环境学报,2016,25(8):1320-1326.Xi Xiaokang, Zhu Zhongyuan, Hao Xiangyun. Grassland plant communities classification and diversity analysis in the Xilin River Basin[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2016, 25(8): 1320-1326. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [24] 智永明,韩继伟,邓超,等. 基于原状土柱土壤水分传感器率定方法的研究[J]. 水文,2016,36(4):48-52.Zhi Yongming, Han Jiwei, Deng Chao, et al. Soil moisture sensor calibration method based on undisturbed soil column[J]. Hydrology, 2016, 36(4): 48-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [25] 全国水文标准化技术委员会、水文仪器分技术委员会. 土壤水分(墒情)监测仪器基本技术条件:GB/T 28418-2012[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
    [26] Tian Zhengchao, Ren Tusheng, Horton Robert, et al. Estimating soil bulk density with combined commercial soil water content and thermal property sensors[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2020, 196: 104445-104452.
    [27] 张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2004.
    [28] 郭中小,魏永富,廖梓龙,等. 锡林河流域地下水位管理阈值研究[J]. 干旱区研究,2017,34(3):479-486.Guo Zhongxiao, Wei Yongfu, Liao Zilong, et al. Threshold values of groundwater level management in the Xilin River Basin[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2017, 34(3): 479-486. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [29] 多兰,于瑞宏,张艳霞,等. 锡林河流域降水量时空动态及对NDVI的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2019,41(5):63-72.Duo Lan, Yu Ruihong, Zhang Yanxia, et al. Temporal and spatial dynamics of precipitation in Xilin River Basin and its effect on NDVI[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(5): 63-72. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [30] 赵坤. 草原内陆河浅滩-深潭序列中地表水-地下水交换对降水的响应[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2019.Zhao Kun. Response of Surface Water-Groundwater Exchange to Pain falls in Riffle-Pool Sequence in Grassland Inland River[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [31] 乔江波,朱元骏,贾小旭,等. 黄土高原关键带全剖面土壤水分空间变异性[J]. 水科学进展,2017,28(4):515-522.Qiao Jiangbo, Zhuis of soil moisture variation and its influencing factors in semi-arid steppe watershedn the critical zone of the Loess Plateau[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2017, 28(4): 515-522. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [32] 纪文瑶. 内蒙古草原生物量、地下生产力及其与环境因子关系研究[D]. 北京:北京师范大学,2013.Ji Wenyao. The Study of Biomass, Belowground Productivity and Their Relationship with Environmental Factors in Inner Mongolia Grassland[D]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [33] 韩少杰,王恩姮,罗松,等. 植被恢复对典型黑土表层土壤压缩性和承载能力的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2016,44(2):31-34.Han Shaojie, Wang Enheng, Luo Song, et al. Effects of vegetation recovery on topsoil compressibility and load support capacity of typical black soil[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2016, 44(2): 31-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [34] 刘雅辉,孙建平,马佳,等. 3种耐盐植物对滨海盐土化学性质及微生物群落结构的影响[J/OL]. 农业资源与环境学报,2020[2020-4-23]. https://doi.org/10.13254/j.jare.2020.0049.Liu" target="_blank"> https://doi.org/10.13254/j.jare.2020.0049.Liu Yahui, Sun Jianping, Ma Jia, et al. Effects of 3 salt-tolerant plants on chemical properties and microbial community structure of coastal saline soil[J/OL]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2020[2020-4-23]. https://doi.org/10.13254/j.jare.2020.0049. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [35] 马龙,王静茹,刘廷玺,等. 2000-2012年科尔沁沙地植被与气候因子间的响应关系[J]. 农业机械学报,2016,47(4):162-172.Ma Long, Wang Jingru, Liu Tingxi, et al. Response relationship between vegetation and climate factors in Horqin sandy land from 2000 to 2012[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(4): 162-172. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [36] 张圣微,张睿,刘廷玺,等. 锡林郭勒草原植被覆盖度时空动态与影响因素分析[J]. 农业机械学报,2017,48(3):253-260.Zhang Shengwei, Zhang Rui, Liu Tingxi, et al. Dynamics of fractional vegetation cover and its influence factors in Xilingol steppe[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(3): 253-260. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [37] 杨大文,丛振涛,尚松浩,等. 从土壤水动力学到生态水文学的发展与展望[J]. 水利学报,2016,47(3):390-397.Yang Dawen, Cong Zhentao, Shang Songhao, et al. Research advances from soil water dynamics to ecohydrology[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2016, 47(3): 390-397. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [38] 高露,张圣微,朱仲元,等. 放牧对干旱半干旱草原植物群落结构和生态功能的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2019,26(6):205-211.Gao Lu, Zhang Shengwei, Zhu Zhongyuan, et al. Effects of grazing on plant communities and ecological functions in typical steppe[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(6): 205-211. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [39] Wu Gaolin, Lui Yu, Yang Zheng, et al. Root channels to indicate the increase in soil matrix water infiltration capacity of arid reclaimed mine soils[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 546: 133-139.
    [40] Qiu Yang, Fu Bojie, Wang Jun, et al. Soil moisture variation in relation to topography and land use in a hillslope catchment of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2011, 240(3/4): 243-263.
    [41] 唐敏. 黄土丘陵区坡地土壤水热特征及其耦合效应研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.Tang Min. Characteristics of Soil Moisture and Temperature and Their Coupling Effects on Sloping Land in Loess Hilly Region[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [42] 徐满厚,刘敏,薛娴,等. 增温、刈割对高寒草甸地上植被生长的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2015,24(2):231-236.Xu Manhou, Liu Min, Xue Xian, et al. Effects of warming and clipping on the growth of aboveground vegetation in an Alpine meadow[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(2): 231-236. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [43] 雷志栋,胡和平,杨诗秀. 土壤水研究进展与评述[J]. 水科学进展,1999,10(3):311-318.Lei Zhidong, Hu Heping, Yang Shixiu. A review of soil water research[J]. Advances in Water Science, 1999, 10(3): 311-318. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [44] 吴小刚,王文平,李斌,等. 中亚热带森林土壤有机碳的海拔梯度变化[J/OL]. 土壤学报,2020[2020-05-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1119.P.20200323.0951.002" target="_blank"> http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1119.P.20200323.0951.002. html.Wu Xiaogang, Wang Wenping, Li Bin, et al. Altitude gradient of soil organic carbon in forest soil in the mid-subtropical zone of China[J/OL]. Acta Soil Science, 2020[2020-05-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1119.P.20200323.0951.002" target="_blank"> http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1119.P.20200323.0951.002. html. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  • 期刊类型引用(13)

    1. 石耀辉,王海龙,朱永超,吴东丽,丁明明,勾秋磊,侯飙,张全军,刘聪,杨大生,张静. 宇宙射线中子法土壤水分监测在不同生态系统雨季的适用性. 气象科技. 2024(01): 1-9 . 百度学术
    2. 雷逸甦,粟晓玲,褚江东,张特,刘雨翰. 基于生态系统恢复力的干旱区植被生态需水阈值计算方法与应用. 湖泊科学. 2024(02): 645-656 . 百度学术
    3. 刘廷玺,赵心毓,段利民,王怡璇,黎明扬,李媛康. 锡林河流域草原生态系统地上生物量时空分布特征及其影响因子. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2024(02): 604-618 . 百度学术
    4. 杜明成,张建云,王振龙,刘猛,刘翠善,王国庆. 皖北平原不同土壤水分养分差异性研究. 水利水运工程学报. 2023(01): 120-130 . 百度学术
    5. 何晓帆,田丽慧,汪海娇,金耀涛,李耀. 高寒沙地沙棘群落的土壤水分时空变异特征. 水土保持通报. 2023(02): 23-33 . 百度学术
    6. 白星雯,布日古德,洪光宇,李炜,邵飞舟,张雷. 毛乌素沙地典型人工林土壤水分特征及其对降水的响应. 林草资源研究. 2023(06): 52-60 . 百度学术
    7. 郭艳菊,马晓静,许爱云,史佳梅,刘万龙,许冬梅. 宁夏东部风沙区沙化草地土壤水分和植被的空间特征. 生态学报. 2022(04): 1571-1581 . 百度学术
    8. 武强,黄娜,罗孳孳,唐余学,朱玉涵,徐倩倩. 宇宙射线中子法测量区域土壤水分准确性季节变化研究. 农业机械学报. 2022(01): 321-330 . 百度学术
    9. 杜明成,张建云,王振龙,刘翠善,王国庆. 皖北杨楼流域玉米农田土壤水变化特征及驱动因子研究. 水资源与水工程学报. 2022(01): 206-214 . 百度学术
    10. 韩新生,于艺鹏,蔡进军,李振华,许浩,李维倩,郭永忠,万海霞,王月玲,董立国,刘广全. 宁南黄土丘陵区中庄小流域土壤水分空间变异及影响因子. 中国水土保持科学(中英文). 2022(03): 44-52 . 百度学术
    11. 谢正丰,王冬梅,张鹏,张泽洲,任怀新,王慧,黄薇,张琳琳. 黄土高寒区小流域土壤水分空间变异与环境影响因子. 水土保持学报. 2022(04): 196-203 . 百度学术
    12. 袁立敏,杨制国,薛博,高海燕,韩照日格图. 呼伦贝尔草原风蚀坑土壤水分异质效应研究. 干旱区研究. 2022(05): 1598-1606 . 百度学术
    13. 宋孝玉,刘雨,覃琳,刘晓迪,王陇. 内蒙古鄂托克旗天然草地植被生态需水量研究. 农业工程学报. 2021(03): 107-115 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(16)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  813
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  350
  • 被引次数: 29
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-03-18
  • 修回日期:  2020-04-26
  • 发布日期:  2020-06-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回