高级检索+

平原农区乡村聚落的空间格局演变模式

Evolution patterns of spatial layout in rural settlements of plain agricultural areas

  • 摘要: 揭示平原农区乡村聚落空间格局的演变规律,对于理解乡村空间系统演化特征、支撑区域乡村规划与可持续发展具有重要意义。该研究以山东省聊城市为研究区,基于1982、2002和2022年3期遥感影像,解译获得乡村聚落矢量数据,分析了1982—2022年的聚落规模及空间格局变化,并考虑T1-T2-T3时段的连续变化过程,提出14种乡村聚落空间格局组合演变模式,进一步揭示不同演变模式的基本特征。结果表明:1)乡村聚落呈现规模增长而数量递减,2002—2022年的规模增长弱于1982—2002年的特征。绝大多数乡村聚落规模较小,不同聚落的空间联系变化与聚落规模等级密切相关。2)乡村聚落空间格局呈现多样化演变模式。独立-独立模式和合并-独立模式为主体,表明多数乡村聚落在长时间尺度下保持相对稳定;独立-合并、独立-城区吞并、合并-合并、合并-城区吞并等模式对乡村聚落面积增长的影响更大;新生与消亡对聚落变化的影响较小。3)乡村聚落演变模式呈现差异明显的空间分布特征。独立-独立模式及合并-独立模式广泛分布,与平原农区生产生活条件及乡村聚落与耕地错落有致分布的特点相吻合;围绕中心城区分布的模式受城镇辐射效应明显,被城区吞并可能性大;沿线状廊道分布的模式受交通条件以及中心城区与各县城联动发展主轴的引导作用。综上,该研究通过系统解析平原农区乡村聚落空间格局的时空演变特征与演变模式,揭示了多时段连续变化过程中14种演变模式空间分布特征,为区域乡村空间优化布局、土地资源高效利用及促进城乡协调发展提供科学依据。

     

    Abstract: Resolving the conflict between rural settlements and cultivated land is one of the critical steps in the plain agricultural areas. The “1.8 billion mu cultivated land red line” can also be implemented to prevent the “non-agriculturalization of cultivated land”. Therefore, it is crucial to explore the fundamental patterns of the spatial evolution on the rural settlements in the plain agricultural regions. This study aims to investigate the long-term evolution of the rural settlement spatial patterns in Liaocheng, Shandong Province, China. The North China Plain was characterized by the fertile land, dense agricultural use, and relatively low urbanization levels. The high-resolution satellite images were captured from 1982, 2002, and 2022. Rural settlement patches were interpreted and vectorized with the consistent geometric accuracy. GIS spatial analysis was carried out to determine the cumulative distribution metrics, such as the size, distribution, and clustering features of the settlements over 40 years. A novel framework of 14 compound spatial patterns was proposed to consider the full temporal trajectory across three time-nodes (T1-T2-T3), rather than each interval in the isolation as in the previous studies (T1: 1982-2002, T2: 2002-2022, and T3: 1982-2022). The results showed that: (1) Rural settlements exhibited a trend of increasing in size while decreaing in number, with the characteristic that growth in scale from 2002 to2022 was less intense than that from 1982 to 2002. Specifically, the total number of the rural settlements declined from 7742 in 1982 to 5119 in 2022. While the cumulative settlement area was more than doubled—from 54656.14 to 111986.21 hm2. Most settlements remained at small scale. The average size followed a power-law distribution pattern, with a small number of the large settlements and a high proportion of small ones. Larger settlements were tended to be more dispersed (e.g., Average Nearest Neighbor ratio above 0.8). While the smaller settlements exhibited increasingly clustered into the spatial distributions (ANN values ranging from 0.6 to 0.7), indicating the stronger local aggregation. (2) The spatial patterns showed the diversified evolution patterns: The Independent-Independent and Merged-Independent patterns were dominant, together accounting for over 80% of the total number and settlement area. The most settlements maintained the structural and spatial stability over the 40-year period, especially in the agriculturally dominated areas with the limited urban influence. The long-term persistence of these patterns reflected the strict land-use constraints and the interwoven layout of the settlements and arable land in the plain agricultural region. The total area was depended mainly on the Independent-Merged, Independent-Urban Annexation, Merged-Merged, and Merged-Urban Annexation pattern. This variation was often driven by the rural land consolidation and urban expansion pressures. In contrast, there were the relatively limited effects of the New Establishment and Disappearance patterns. (3) Distinct spatial features were characterized by the different patterns: Independent-Independent and Merged-Independent patterns were aligned with the interspersed distribution of the settlements and farmland in plains. While the patterns near central urban areas shared the high risks of the urban encroachment, due to the radiation effects. Patterns surrounding central urban areas were strongly influenced by the urban expansion. The higher likelihood was found to be absorbed into urban space. The linear corridor distribution, such as those involving Merged or Disappearance, were predominantly aligned along the key transportation routes and inter-county development axes. The accessibility and coordinated urban-rural planning were significantly improved the spatial restructure of the settlements.

     

/

返回文章
返回