高级检索+

基于生态服务的内蒙古草地生态承载力评估

Estimated ecological carrying capacity on grassland of Inner Mongolia based on the priority of ecological services

  • 摘要: 随着全球温升和人类活动的加剧,草地生态系统出现了明显的退化。生态承载力是衡量人类活动与自然环境之间作用关系的科学指标,是制定区域生态安全和可持续发展决策的重要依据。目前的生态承载力核算多侧重于生态系统的供给层面,没能将生态服务和生态承载力进行有机结合,在一个框架内进行科学量化,无法满足生态保护与生产实践的精细化管理需求。该研究根据内蒙古生态环境制约因素和调控机理,以生产力为核心指标,把草地生态服务和畜牧业生产统一到了一个研究框架内,核算了草地主要生态服务功能对地上生产力占用状况,分析了草地生态系统对畜牧业发展的支撑能力。结果表明1991—2020年内蒙古用于维持生态系统服务的地上净初级生产力(aboveground net primary productivity,ANPP)占用范围在30~240 g/(m2·a)之间,空间分布上呈由东北向西南递减的趋势;1991—2020年内蒙古草地生态系统生态载畜量为7864.49万羊单位,实际载畜总量为10435.57万羊单位,草地资源消耗量超出了供给量;内蒙古草地生态载畜量空间差异很大,整个研究区域内草地生态承载状态指数范围在0.62~8.68之间,最大承载状态指数范围在0.21~2.79之间。草地自然更新占用ANPP值较大,因此极大降低了内蒙古草地生态承载量。从空间分布上看,内蒙古东部草地畜牧生态承载能力较强,而西部地区草地畜牧超载情况较为严重,草地承载压力较大,同时存在社会经济发展与生态承载力失衡风险。

     

    Abstract: Temperate grassland vegetation can dominate in Inner Mongolia of the Eurasian steppe. These ecosystem services can support both animal husbandry and the local economy. While some ecological functions can also deliver, such as wind erosion control, soil and water conservation, hydrological regulation, and biodiversity maintenance. However, these ecosystems can be confined to the rising global temperatures and human activities. Particularly, the grassland degradation has posed a serious threat to the regional ecological security in sustainable agriculture. In this study, an ecological carrying capacity (ECC) assessment framework was proposed to maintain the essential grassland ecological services. The environmental features and ecological regulatory functions of the grasslands were also considered in Inner Mongolia. The spatial patterns of the carrying status were then quantified for the grassland animal husbandry. The grassland carrying capacity index was employed to compare the grassland ecosystems in order to support animal husbandry over different league cities. The results show that the spatial distribution of the annual average aboveground net primary productivity (ANPPW) in grasslands of Inner Mongolia exhibited a gradual decreasing trend from the northeast to the southwest from 1991 to 2020. The highest ANPPW values reached 60 g/(m2·a) in the Greater Khingan and Yinshan Mountain regions, which were characterized by the significant topographic relief, high soil erodibility, and strong rainfall erosivity. The ANPPF was allocated for the wind erosion control and sand fixation, indicating the spatial pattern with the decrease from the west to the east. The ANPPF values were higher, typically exceeding 80 g/(m2·a), in Hulun Buir, the southeastern Horqin Sandy Land, and the central Ulanqab Plateau, with the relatively flat terrain and the high surface deposits. Overall, the optimal range of the ANPPS was required to sustain the ecosystem service functions in Inner Mongolia. There was some variation between 30 and 240 g/(m2·a), indicating the spatially decreasing gradient from the northeast to the southwest. The relatively high ANPPS were also required to maintain the natural regeneration of the grassland ecosystems in most areas. The ECC of the grassland ecosystem was 78.65 million sheep units from 1991 to 2020, while the actual total livestock was 104.36 million sheep units. The livestock demand for the grassland resources also exceeded the supply capacity. The ecological carrying pressure index of the grasslands in the entire study area ranged from 0.62 to 8.68, and the economic carrying pressure index ranged from 0.21 to 2.79. The relatively large ANPP was occupied by the natural renewal of grasslands, thus greatly reducing the ECC of the grasslands in Inner Mongolia. Spatially, the relatively high ECC of the animal husbandry was observed in the eastern grasslands. While there was a more serious overloading of the animal husbandry in the western grasslands. The ANPP was used to characterize the provision of three ecosystem services; Some functions can also be expected to reflect the magnitude of these services, such as biodiversity maintenance, water conservation, and atmospheric purification. It is therefore necessary to incorporate the additional functional indicators of the ecosystems in order to improve the accounting framework for the ECC using ecosystem services. The framework can be expected to estimate the grassland ECC. The findings can provide the decision-making on the grassland resource utilization and regional ecology in sustainable agriculture, thereby supporting some initiatives, such as the grassland ecological compensation, grazing withdrawal, and grassland restoration.

     

/

返回文章
返回