高级检索+

油菜直播厢面整型仿形装置防黏附机理分析

Mechanism analysis of anti-adhesion of profiling device for ridge shaping in direct seeding of rape

  • 摘要: 针对长江中下游稻油轮作区土壤黏重导致厢面整型难度大,仿形单体作业产生沟壑、黏堵等造成厢面凹凸不平、产生积水渍害,油菜播深稳定性不足、播种质量差等问题,该研究对油菜机械直播厢面整型仿形机构防黏附机理开展分析。力学分析得到旋压式厢面整型过程机械土壤互作原理,被动旋压辊表面与土壤接触面积降低、压力增加致使黏附难以脱离;主动旋压辊表面与厢面间速度差,导致已成型厢面对旋压辊表面黏附土壤剪切挤压,形成主动防黏;反向旋压辊利用未成型厢面打磨旋压辊表面实现主动防黏。开展DEM-MBD仿真试验分析主动旋压辊表面黏附的土壤颗粒速度、位移和动能变化,探明土壤黏附多发生在旋压辊表面未成型厢面接触区,成型厢面刮削产生的主动防黏效果主要发生于成型厢面接触区。台架试验结果表明正转旋压辊的黏附面积、黏附体积和厢面粗糙度均随转速增加而先增后减,转速比100%附近防黏附效果差,反转旋压辊黏附性随转速增加下降、厢面粗糙度随转速增加上升,被动旋压辊防黏效果和厢面整型质量较差,台架试验黏附现象与理论分析相符;以正转旋压辊转速、土壤绝对含水率为试验因素,旋压辊黏附面积、黏附体积和厢面粗糙度为评价指标开展正交台架试验,结果表明旋压辊转速、土壤含水率对旋压辊黏附效果显著,正转旋压辊对土壤含水率变化的适应性较好。田间试验结果表明,在土壤绝对含水率大于30%黏重土壤稻茬地作业情景下,正旋主动旋压辊土壤黏附面积和质量分别为62.4 cm2和174 g,较被动旋压辊黏附效果分别提升90.05%和87.77%,厢面粗糙度为15.7 mm,较被动旋压辊提升86.08%,反旋主动旋压易导致厢面过度打磨。该研究可为该地区种床整理装备及关键部件的设计与改进提供参考。

     

    Abstract: In the rice-oil rotation regions of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, the prevalence of heavy, sticky clay soil presents significant challenges for mechanized rapeseed planting. Conventional profiling mechanisms often struggle to maintain consistent bed shaping, leading to severe soil adhesion, gully formation, and clogging of the machinery. These issues result in uneven seedbed surfaces, water accumulation, and waterlogging stress, which in turn compromise the stability of seeding depth and the overall quality of rapeseed establishment. To address these agronomic and mechanical bottlenecks, this study investigates the anti-adhesion mechanism of a rotary compressing and shaping device designed for overall bed profiling. The research begins with a mechanical-soil interaction analysis of the rotary compressing process. Theoretical results indicate that during the operation of a passive (non-driven) rotary roller, the contact area between the roller surface and the soil decreases while contact pressure increases, leading to inevitable soil accumulation and difficult detachment. In contrast, an active (driven) rotary roller generates a relative velocity difference between its surface and the seedbed. For forward rotation, the already-formed bed exerts a shearing and squeezing action on the roller surface, creating an active anti-adhesion mechanism. Conversely, while a reverse rotation roller utilizes the unformed soil to scour the roller surface—effectively preventing adhesion—the opposing motion and excessive grinding force tend to induce defects such as surface cracks on the seedbed. To visualize these microscopic interactions, a coupled DEM-MBD simulation was conducted. The simulation analyzed the velocity, displacement, and kinetic energy changes of soil particles adhering to the active roller. It revealed that soil adhesion primarily initiates in the contact zone with the unformed, loose soil, whereas the active anti-adhesion effect predominantly occurs in the contact zone with the compacted, formed bed. Subsequent bench tests corroborated the theoretical and simulation findings. Results showed that for the forward-rotating roller, soil adhesion area, adhesion volume, and bed surface roughness followed a trend of initially increasing and then decreasing as rotational speed increased. Notably, the anti-adhesion performance was poorest when the speed ratio was near 100% (where the linear velocity matches the forward speed). For the reverse-rotating roller, while adhesion decreased with higher speeds, the bed surface roughness increased significantly due to soil disturbance. The passive roller demonstrated the worst performance in both anti-adhesion and shaping quality. Further optimization was conducted using orthogonal bench tests, with roller speed and absolute soil moisture content as experimental factors. The evaluation indices included adhesion area, adhesion volume, and surface roughness. The results indicated that both rotational speed and soil moisture significantly affect adhesion performance. Crucially, the forward-rotating roller demonstrated superior adaptability to variations in soil moisture content compared to other configurations. Finally, field trials were conducted in post-rice stubble fields with sticky soil (absolute water content >30%). The forward active rotary roller achieved a soil adhesion area of 62.4 cm2 and an adhesion mass of 174 g, representing a reduction in adhesion of 90.05% and 87.77%, respectively, compared to the passive roller. The bed surface roughness was recorded at 15.7 mm, an improvement of 86.08% over the passive counterpart. In contrast, the reverse-rotating roller resulted in excessive grinding of the bed surface. This study confirms that the forward-rotating active profiling mechanism is the optimal solution for sticky soils, providing a critical reference for the design and improvement of seedbed preparation equipment in the Yangtze River basin

     

/

返回文章
返回