高级检索+

中国耕地景观细碎化对农业绿色全要素生产率的影响

Effects of cropland landscape fragmentation on agricultural green total factor productivity in China

  • 摘要: 探究耕地景观细碎化对农业绿色全要素生产率的影响机制及其空间效应,为优化耕地空间布局、制定绿色农业发展政策提供科学支撑。文章基于2000—2022年全国285个城市数据,从规模性、规则性、集聚性3个维度测算耕地景观细碎化的空间演变特征,采用超效率非期望SBM―GML模型测度农业绿色全要素生产率并分析其时空演变规律,运用双固定效应模型与空间计量模型探究耕地景观细碎化对农业绿色全要素生产率的影响及空间效应。结果表明:1)2000―2022年全国耕地景观细碎化指数从0.480升至0.501,空间上呈现由东向西递增的分布特征,其中黄土高原与云贵高原为重度热点区。2)2000―2022年农业绿色全要素生产率呈现稳步上升趋势,其中技术进步为主要驱动力;空间上呈现“东部引领,中部快速发展和西部稳步提升”的变化态势。3)耕地景观细碎化对农业绿色全要素生产率的影响为负向,且存在明显的空间溢出效应。其中,东部地区空间溢出效应显著强于中、西部地区,粮食主产区可内部消解负面影响,产销平衡区则受双重约束难以实现区域补偿。研究系统解析二者时空关联机制,为耕地布局空间优化与农业高质量发展提供决策依据。

     

    Abstract: Agricultural green total factor productivity (AGTFP) has been widely used to optimize cropland spatial layout in sustainable agriculture. This study aims to systematically investigate the spatiotemporal evolution of cropland landscape fragmentation and AGTFP in China from 2000 to 2022. Land use data was collected from 285 Chinese cities. ArcGIS 10.8 and Fragstats 4.2 platforms were employed to measure cropland landscape fragmentation from three dimensions: scale, regularity, and agglomeration. Spatiotemporal evolution of fragmentation was subsequently analyzed after measurement. A super-efficient unconditional SBM-GML model was used to estimate AGTFP and the contribution rates of technical efficiency. Spatiotemporal patterns of AGTFP were then examined. Furthermore, a double fixed effect model and a spatial econometric model were employed to clarify the spatial impact of cultivated land landscape fragmentation on AGTFP and its spatial spillover effects. A systematic investigation was implemented to explore the heterogeneous effects of cropland landscape fragmentation on AGTFP, particularly from the perspective of scale, regularity, and agglomeration. The results indicated that: (1) Cropland landscape fragmentation index increased from 0.4802 to 0.5008 from 2000 to 2022, indicating the spatial shift of distribution pattern from east to west. The Loess Plateau and Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau emerged as severe fragmentation hotspots, while the central regions experienced increasingly outstanding fragmentation. The increasing rate of cropland landscape fragmentation decelerated slightly after 2020, indicating a notable weakening trend. (2) The AGTFP showed a steady upward trend, with technological progress as the main driving force. Spatially, there was a changing trend of “leading in the east, rapid development in the middle, and steady improvement in the west”. The AGTFP in the central region increased rapidly after 2010, and the high-level areas gradually spread to the west. (3) There was a negative impact of cropland landscape fragmentation on AGTFP, with an outstanding spatial spillover effect. Among them, the spatial spillover effect in the eastern region was significantly stronger than that in the central and western regions. The main grain-producing areas eliminated the negative impact internally, while the production and marketing balance areas were difficult to achieve regional compensation, due to double constraints. Regional heterogeneity stemmed from the various levels of economy, technological diffusion capacity, and geo-ecological conditions in eastern, central, and western China. The heterogeneity among grain functional zones was attributed to the differences in agricultural technology levels, the market strength, and the factor allocation capacity. The findings can provide a scientific basis to optimize the spatial layout of cultivated land in high-quality agriculture.

     

/

返回文章
返回