高级检索+

遥感在盐碱灾害监测与治理中的应用现状与展望

Status and prospects of remote sensing applications in monitoring and managing saline–alkali soil disaster

  • 摘要: 针对土壤盐碱化遥感响应机理复杂、单一参数反演难以揭示水盐过程并有效支撑治理决策的问题,该文旨在厘清不同监测对象的遥感响应及其与盐碱化过程、治理需求之间的联系,构建面向灾害监测、风险识别、治理分区与成效评估的应用分析框架。基于国内外相关研究,系统梳理盐碱地光谱响应机理及遥感技术演进过程,归纳植被、土壤、水文及农田系统等多类遥感指标的胁迫指示意义,并总结多源遥感信息在治理决策支持中的作用路径。结果表明,盐碱灾害遥感响应受水分、盐分、植被覆盖、地表结构及区域环境等因素共同影响,具有明显的非唯一性。植被、土壤、水文和农田指标分别从生态胁迫、表层盐分与土壤退化、水盐迁移与返盐风险以及农业生产功能等方面表征盐碱化影响,多对象、多指标协同分析能够增强对盐碱化状态、形成过程及功能效应的综合识别。多源遥感信息可通过高风险区域识别、盐碱化程度与主导因素诊断、治理措施匹配及长时序变化监测,为风险识别、治理分区、路径选择和成效评估提供支撑。研究可为区域尺度盐碱地治理决策与动态监测提供理论依据和方法参考。

     

    Abstract: Soil salinization and alkalization are complex types of land degradation driven by long-term imbalance between water movement and salt accumulation. Saline–alkali soil disasters can be characterized as surface salt accumulation, vegetation degradation, hydrological imbalance, cropland productivity loss, and land use. Remote sensing has been widely used to evaluate salt-affected land and then monitor its spatial dynamics. But existing studies still focus on the retrieval of single soil parameters. This review aimed to explore the status and prospects of remote sensing in monitoring and managing saline–alkali disasters. Particularly, remote sensing information was selected to support risk identification, spatial zoning, decision making, and evaluation. Recent studies on saline–alkali land remote sensing were reviewed from the perspectives of response mechanisms, monitoring objects, diagnostic indicators, and applications. 1) The spectral, microwave, and thermal response of the salt-affected land was summarized under different climatic backgrounds, soil moisture, salt occurrence forms, vegetation cover, and surface structures, according to remote sensing signals. 2) The monitoring objects were organized into four dimensions: vegetation response, soil surface state, hydrological process, and cropland system performance. A comparison was made on the typical indicators from optical, thermal infrared, and microwave observations, including vegetation structural and physiological indicators, soil salinity and brightness indices, microwave backscattering and dielectric-related information, evapotranspiration, soil moisture, land surface temperature, and yield gap. 3) Multi-source remote sensing information was summarized to assess the surface responses, water–salt processes, and agricultural production functions. Remote sensing responses of saline–alkali disasters were strongly correlated with the soil salt, soil moisture, vegetation cover, soil texture, surface roughness, and regional environmental background. Salt crusts or spots formed on the soil surface after salt accumulation in arid and semi-arid bare or sparsely vegetated areas, leading to the high reflectance in visible and near-infrared bands. By contrast, salts were dissolved to form the moist, hidden, or root-zone forms in coastal humid regions, irrigated croplands, or areas with higher vegetation cover. Soil moisture or vegetation cover also weakens the spectral signal of surface salt. Therefore, conventional salinity or brightness indices were more suitable for exposed surface salts under bare or low cover, whereas humid, irrigated, or vegetated regions required integrating vegetation response, hydrological, and ground observations. Vegetation indicators presented the cumulative effects of saline–alkali stress on canopy structure, physiological condition, phenological rhythm, and crop growth. Soil surface indicators also provided further information on salt exposure and structural degradation, but their reliability was constrained by soil moisture and mixed pixels. Hydrological indicators (such as evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and groundwater information) were used to diagnose the driving mechanisms of salt migration and redistribution. Cropland system indicators, including crop growth anomalies, yield potential, cropping structure, and farmland abandonment, were used to further reflect the impact of saline–alkali stress on agricultural production functions. These indicators were integrated to support the differentiation areas under deep water–salt imbalance, seasonal or management-induced surface salinity, and ecological adaptation, rather than the intensive agricultural use. Remote sensing contributed to saline–alkali disaster monitoring and management by information acquisition, diagnosis, zoning, and evaluation, rather than by directly replacing engineering drainage, agronomic improvement, soil amendment, or ecological restoration. A multi-object and multi-source monitoring framework was achieved in the robustness of saline–alkali disaster diagnosis under complex environmental conditions. The practical remote sensing products were observed for decision-making. Future research should strengthen regional response mechanisms, multi-source data fusion, long-term monitoring, and the integration of remote sensing with ground observation networks, data platforms, and intelligent models. The finding can provide a strong reference to improve the continuity, precision, and accessibility of remote sensing information in monitoring and managing saline–alkali disasters.

     

/

返回文章
返回