高级检索+

不同干燥方法对菊花品质特性、微观结构和挥发性成分的影响

Effects of different drying methods on the quality characteristics, microstructure and volatile components of chrysanthemum

  • 摘要: 为探究不同干燥方式对菊花品质特性和风味特性的影响,采用热风干燥(hot air drying, HD)、红外联合热风干燥(infrared combined with hot air drying, IHD)和真空干燥(vacuum drying, VD)等3种干燥方式于50 ℃对菊花进行脱水处理,系统分析其干燥特性、色泽、营养品质、微观结构及风味成分的变化。结果表明,IHD效率最高,能有效保留产品色泽并形成疏松多孔的微观结构,且IHD菊花中总酚、总黄酮及其他活性成分含量最高。通过风味分析技术结合多元统计方法,可有效区分3种干燥方式的气味轮廓,并筛选出以萜烯类和醇类为主的关键差异标志物20种。其中,IHD总挥发性成分浓度最高(421.11 mg/kg),表现为独特的烘焙香;相比之下,HD与VD则分别呈现草本清香和天然花果香。综上,红外联合热风干燥在提高干燥效率、保留营养成分及丰富风味物质方面具有显著优势,可为菊花的高值化加工提供理论依据。

     

    Abstract: Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. is a medicinal and edible dual-purpose herb that is highly beneficial to health, possessing a variety of pharmacological effects and being widely used in numerous applications. However, the high moisture content and perishable nature of fresh chrysanthemum make its preservation challenging, necessitating processing. The drying process can effectively extend the shelf life by reducing microbial growth through dehydration, and different drying methods have significant impacts on the quality characteristics and flavor profiles of chrysanthemum. In this study, three drying methods were employed to dehydrate chrysanthemum, namely hot air drying (HD), infrared combined hot air drying (IHD), and vacuum drying (VD), and their effects on drying characteristics, color, nutritional quality, microstructure, and flavor components were systematically analyzed. Results showed that IHD exhibited the shortest drying time (7.3 h), followed by HD (8.8 h) and VD (18.6 h). The Page and Weibull models best described the drying behavior (R2 > 0.997), and the drying constant a in the Page model was highest for IHD (0.5722) and lowest for VD (0.1661), further confirming the fastest moisture diffusion in IHD. IHD and HD yielded significantly higher L* and b* values than VD (p < 0.05), indicating better color retention. Microstructural observation revealed that VD best preserved cellular integrity with honeycomb-like structures, followed by IHD with moderate porosity, while HD showed severe structural shrinkage. IHD achieved the highest soluble sugar content (42.27 ± 2.04 mg/g), 19.34% and 88.54% higher than HD and VD respectively, attributed to shorter drying time minimizing Maillard consumption. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents followed the order IHD > HD > VD (p < 0.05). HPLC analysis revealed different stability patterns: chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, and isochlorogenic acid were highest in IHD, while luteolin and apigenin were highest in VD due to prolonged β-glucosidase activation under longer drying duration. The total content of six characteristic bioactive compounds (chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, isochlorogenic acid, apigenin, luteolin, and buddleoside) maintained the trend IHD > HD > VD. E-nose PCA effectively discriminated the three drying groups with 91.3% cumulative contribution (PC1 = 60.1%, PC2 = 31.2%). GC-IMS identified 68 volatile compounds across all samples, with hierarchical clustering revealing five characteristic regions showing distinct compound distributions among drying methods. For instance, IHD exhibited the highest abundance of floral and fruity compounds such as pentanal and β-myrcene, while VD showed the highest levels of acetoin and 2-formyl-5-methylthiophene, and HD presented high levels of terpenes such as α-pinene. GC-MS identified 208 volatile compounds. HD, IHD, and VD contained 172, 183, and 179 compounds respectively, with 105 common compounds forming the core volatile profile. Total volatile concentration was highest in IHD (421.11 mg/kg), significantly exceeding HD (355.88 mg/kg) and VD (397.24 mg/kg). Terpenes (87 compounds) and alcohols (49 compounds) dominated all samples. PLS-DA identified 20 key differential volatile markers (VIP > 1), primarily terpenes and alcohols including 3,4,4-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one, α-farnesene, β-myrcene , β-vetivenene and so on. Most VIP markers were common compounds, indicating drying methods modulated abundance rather than generating unique compounds. Characteristic flavor profiles emerged: HD featured herbal, cooling, and woody notes (high eucalyptol, camphene); IHD exhibited roasted, spicy, and caramel-like aromas (elevated furans, esters, phenolics) from Maillard reactions; VD delivered fruity, sweet, and floral notes (high terpenes) closest to fresh chrysanthemum. Alcohols correlated with floral/fruity notes, while terpenes contributed herbal/green characteristics, consistent with E-nose observations. In conclusion, IHD emerges as the optimal processing technology, offering superior drying efficiency, better retention of nutritional components and most bioactive compounds, and the highest total volatile concentration with desirable roasted and spicy notes, through synergistic infrared and hot air heating that accelerates drying and promotes compound release. These findings provide a scientific basis for optimizing industrial chrysanthemum drying processes to achieve desired quality attributes for high-value products. Future studies should investigate the interactive effects of temperature and drying methods, as well as the potential of infrared-combined vacuum drying strategies.

     

/

返回文章
返回