纳滤膜孔径对沼液超滤透过液养分富集与膜污染行为的影响

黄致祥; 崔文静; 刘婉岑; 夏若涵; 曹丁戈; 丁相瑞; 李国学; 罗文海

doi:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202212189

纳滤膜孔径对沼液超滤透过液养分富集与膜污染行为的影响

黄致祥^1,2,3,
崔文静⁴,
刘婉岑^1,3,
夏若涵^1,3,
曹丁戈^1,3,
丁相瑞^1,2,3,
李国学^1,3,
罗文海^1,2,3

1.
中国农业大学资源与环境学院农田土壤污染防控与修复北京市重点实验室，北京 100193
2.
中国农业大学有机循环研究院（苏州），苏州 215100
3.
农业农村部农业绿色低碳重点实验室，北京 100193
4.
青岛农业大学资源与环境学院，青岛 266109

基金项目: 中国科学技术协会青年人才托举工程项目（YESS20200124）；"十四五"国家重点研发计划（2022YFD1900300）；中国农业大学2115人才工程资助（2017025）

计量
- 文章访问数: 70
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 582
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-12-28
- 修回日期: 2023-04-13
- 发布日期: 2023-04-29

Effects of membrane pore size on nutrient enrichment and membrane fouling behavior in nanofiltration of ultrafiltration permeate from biogas slurry concentration

HUANG Zhixiang^1,2,3,
CUI Wenjing⁴,
LIU Wancen^1,3,
XIA Ruohan^1,3,
CAO Dingge^1,3,
DING Xiangrui^1,2,3,
LI Guoxue^1,3,
LUO Wenhai^1,2,3

1.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
2.
Organic Recycling Research Institute (Suzhou) of China Agricultural University, Suzhou, 215100, China
3.
Key Laboratory of Low-carbon Green Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P. R. China, Beijing, 100193, China
4.
College of Resources and Environment, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China

摘要

摘要: 超滤（ultrafiltration，UF）能有效浓缩沼液，但透过液中仍含有大量养分，可进一步采用纳滤（nanofiltration，NF）等精密膜浓缩利用。NF膜的孔径会直接影响膜的截留特性和通量，从而影响浓缩性能。为了探究NF膜孔径对沼液浓缩过程养分富集效果和膜污染行为的影响，该研究以鸡粪沼液的UF透过液为研究对象，分别采用800 D、500 D、100 D的NF膜（平均膜孔径分别为2.0、1.0、0.5 nm）进行浓缩，重点分析养分截留效果和膜污染特征。结果表明：不同孔径的NF膜均能高效截留化学需氧量（chemical oxygen demand，COD）和总磷（total phosphorus，TP），截留率可达68%以上，但对总氮（total nitrogen，TN）和总钾（total potassium，TK）的截留较低，仅为19%～35%。随着膜孔径降低，NF对COD、TN、TP、TK的截留效果略有提高，但整体差异不明显。不同孔径NF膜在沼液浓缩过程均出现了明显的水通量降低。与1.0 nm的NF膜相比，0.5 nm膜较小的孔径和2.0 nm膜较大的初始通量均会导致膜表面有机-无机致密污染层的形成，从而造成水通量快速降低；而1.0 nm膜表面形成的以无机晶体为主的污染层较为疏松，通量下降较为缓慢。综合养分截留效果和水通量变化规律，确定孔径为1.0 nm的NF膜更适用于浓缩沼液的UF透过液，研究结果可为推动沼液膜浓缩的发展与工程应用提供理论与技术支撑。
- 纳滤 /
- 膜孔径 /
- 鸡粪沼液 /
- 膜污染 /
- 养分富集
Abstract: Abstract: Ultrafiltration (UF) can effectively concentrate the biogas slurry, but a large number of nutrients are still remained to be further permeated using nanofiltration (NF) and precision membranes. The pore size of NF membranes can directly dominate the retention characteristics and flux of the membrane, thus affecting the concentration performance. In response to the lack of research on the effect of NF membrane pore size on nutrient enrichment and membrane fouling behavior in the concentration process of biogas slurry, this study aims to determine nutrient retention and the characterization of membrane fouling. The research object was taken as the chicken manure in the biogas slurry of UF, while the NF membranes were set with the membrane pore sizes of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 nm for the concentration. Results showed that the retention rates of chemical oxygen demand (COD) by NF membranes of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 nm were 68%, 77%, and 81%, respectively. The retention rate of COD was higher, as the membrane pore size decreased. By contrast, the retention rates of total nitrogen (TN) by NF membranes of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 nm were 29%, 30% and 35%, respectively. The retention rate of TN was higher, as the membrane pore size decreased. The retention percentages of total phosphorus (TP) by NF membranes of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 nm were 68%, 71%, and 73%, respectively. The retention of TP was higher with the decrease in membrane pore size. The retention rates of total potassium (TK) by NF membranes of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 nm were 19%, 21% and 23%, respectively, where the retention rates of TK were higher, as the membrane pore size decreased. Once the biogas slurry was concentrated to 1/3 of the original volume, there was no difference in the running time between 2.0 and 1.0 nm membrane (1082-1204 min), but the running time of 2.0 and 1.0 nm was significantly less than that of 0.5 nm one (3 200 min, P<0.05), indicating that the smaller pore size NF membrane was less efficiency in the concentration. Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) revealed that the contents of the organic element (C, O, and N) on the surface contamination layer of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 nm membranes were 92.9%, 92.0%, and 93.3%, respectively, indicating the dominated organic contamination. The inorganic contamination of 1.0 nm membranes was more severe than those of 2.0 and 0.5 nm membranes, resulting in a looser contamination layer on the membrane surface. There was a slow decrease in the flux and higher concentration efficiency. Compared with the 1.0 nm membrane, the smaller pore size of the 0.5 nm membrane and the larger initial flux of the 2.0 nm membrane both led to the formation of an organic-inorganic dense contamination layer on the membrane surface, resulting in a rapid reduction in the flux. The Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR) showed that the organic pollutants on the surface of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 nm membranes were mainly macromolecular organic substances, such as protein and humic acid, whereas, the organic pollutants on the surface of 0.5 nm membranes were also contained the polysaccharides. X-ray diffraction (XRD) demonstrated the high overall diffraction intensity of the NF membrane, indicating the relatively stable and pure state of crystal pollutants on the membrane surface. The crystal pollutants were identified by SiO2, FeS2, and Ca2Fe2O5, leading to the organic-inorganic dense contamination on the membrane surface. The smallest contact angle was achieved in the 0.5 nm membrane. The FITR was also combined to reveal the adsorption of the more hydrophilic polysaccharides on the membrane surface. The membrane fouling pore blocking occurred during NF concentration, as a combination of complete, standard, and intermediate pore blocking. There was no influence of membrane pore size on the cake layer formation. The resistance of the membrane originated mainly from the filter cake layer, where the resistance of the filter cake layer accounted for the largest proportion (81.9%-95.6%). The 0.5 nm membrane with the smallest pore size was easy to plug the pore for the formation of a dense filter cake layer, leading to a rapid decrease in flux. As such, the NF membrane with a pore size of 1.0 nm was highly recommended to integrate with the UF in the two-stage concentration of biogas slurry for stable water flux and effective nutrient retention.
- nanofiltration /
- membrane pore size /
- chicken manure biogas slurry /
- membrane fouling /
- nutrient enrichment

HTML全文

参考文献(41)

[1]	岳彩德，董红敏，张万钦，等. 养殖污水/沼液膜浓缩处理技术研究进展[J]. 中国沼气，2018，36(2)：25-33.YUE Caide, DONG Hongmin, ZHANG Wanqin, et al. Research progress of membrane concentration technology for treatment of husbandry wastewater or biogas slurry[J]. China Biogas, 2018, 36(2): 25-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	第二次全国污染源普查公报[J]. 环境保护，2020，48(18)：8-10.
[3]	尹福斌，詹源航，岳彩德，等. 膜分离技术在大型养殖场沼液处理中的应用与展望[J]. 农业环境科学学报，2021，40(11)：2335-2341.YIN Fubin, ZHAN Yuanhang, YUE Caide, et al. Research progress on membrane technology for treatment of husbandry biogas slurry and wastewater[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2021, 40(11): 2335-2341. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	马艳茹，孟海波，沈玉君，等. 秸秆炭强化镁镧氧化物对沼液磷的回收效果[J]. 农业工程学报，2022，38(5)：194-203.MA Yanru, MENG Haibo, SHEN Yujun, et al. Enhanced phosphorus recovery from biogas slurry by biochar of straw with Mg/La oxide[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(5): 194-203. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	贺清尧，石明菲，冯椋，等. 基于膜蒸馏的沼液资源化处理研究进展[J]. 农业工程学报，2021，37(8)：259-268.HE Qingyao, SHI Mingfei, FENG Liang, et al. Research progress of biogas slurry resourceful treatment by membrane distillation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2021, 37(8): 259-268. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	肖华，徐杏，周昕，等. 膜技术在沼气工程沼液减量化处理中的应用[J]. 农业工程学报，2020，36(14)：226-236.XIAO Hua, XU Xing, ZHOU Xin, et al. Application of membrane technology for volume reduction of biogas slurry[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(14): 226-236. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	李赟，刘婉岑，李国学，等. 沼液膜浓缩处理工艺的现状、问题和展望[J]. 中国沼气，2020，38(3)：28-41.LI Yun, LIU Wancen, LI Guoxue, et al. Membrane process concentrating biogas slurry: current situation，problems and the prospect[J]. China Biogas, 2020, 38(3): 28-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	陆佳，刘伟，王欣，等. 超滤膜浓缩处理沼液实验研究[J]. 应用能源技术，2016(8)：49-53.LU Jia, LIU Wei, WANG Xin, et al. Research on biogas slurry concentration by ultrafiltration membrane[J]. Applied Energy Technology, 2016(8): 49-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	王雷. 猪场沼液化学絮凝/电絮凝-纳滤膜浓缩工艺研究[D]. 杭州：浙江大学，2016.WANG Lei. Study on the Combination Process of Coagulation/Electrocoagulation with Nanofiltration for Enriching Biogas Digestion Slurry[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	徐国锐. 沼液纳滤膜浓缩技术及其液体有机肥开发研究[D]. 杭州：浙江大学，2012.XU Guorui. The Research on Concentration Technology for Biogas Slurry Using Nanofiltration Membrane and Subsequent Development of Concentrated Biogas Slurry as Liquid Organic Fertilizer[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	张立卿，王磊，王旭东. 纳滤膜物化特征对膜分离及膜污染影响研究[J]. 水处理技术，2009，35(1)：24-29.ZHANG Liqing, WANG Lei, WANG Xudong. Influence of membrane structure and chemical characteristics on separation and fouling of nanofiltration membranes[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2009, 35(1): 24-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	宋先庆，周杰，刘飞，等. 基于小孔径PVDF内衬膜A/O-MBR膜污染分析[J]. 水处理技术，2020，46(1)：38-42.SONG Xianqing, ZHOU Jie, LIU Fei, et al. Study on membrane fouling of reinforced PVDF membrane with small pore size in A/O-MBR process[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2020, 46(1): 38-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	American Public Health Association. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater[M]. Washington D C: American Public Health Association, 2005.
[14]	LI M S, ZHAO Y J, ZHOU S Y, et al. Resistance analysis for ceramic membrane microfiltration of raw soy sauce[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 299(1/2): 122-129.
[15]	孙伟光. 超滤膜特征有机污染物识别及膜污染控制研究[D]. 哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2018.SUN Weiguang. Identification of Specific Organic Foulants and Control for UF Membrane Fouling[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	ZHAN Y H, YIN F B, YUE C D, et al. Effect of pretreatment on hydraulic performance of the integrated membrane process for concentrating nutrient in biogas digestate from swine manure[J]. Membranes, 2020, 10(10):249.
[17]	范科文，李星，杨艳玲，等. 光催化/活性炭/纳滤组合工艺处理二级出水及对膜污染的控制[J]. 环境科学，2019，40(8)：3626-3632.FAN Kewen, LI Xing, YANG Yanling, et al. Organic matter removal and membrane fouling control of secondary effluents using a combined nanofiltration process[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(8): 3626-3632. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	KANG E, LEE Y, CHON K, et al. Effects of hydrodynamic conditions (diffusion vs. convection) and solution chemistry on effective molecular weight cut-off of negatively charged nanofiltration membranes[J]. Desalination, 2014, 352: 136-141.
[19]	陈伟，佟玲，陈文清，等. 膜分离技术在印染废水分质处理与分段回用中的应用[J]. 环境污染与防治，2008，30(7)：62-66.CHEN Wei, TONG Ling, CHEN Wenqing, et al. Membrane separation technologies for segregated pretreatment and resource recycling of printing and dyeing wastewaters[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2008, 30(7): 62-66. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	ZHAO Y Y, TONG X, CHEN Y S. Fit-for-Purpose design of nanofiltration membranes for simultaneous nutrient recovery and micropollutant removal[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(5): 3352-3361.
[21]	于红蕾，霍守亮，杨周生，等. 纳滤预处理测定景观水体中溶解性有机氮质量浓度及其分布特征[J]. 环境科学，2013，34(6)：2256-2262.YU Honglei, HUO Shouliang, YANG Zhousheng, et al. Measurement of dissolved organic nitrogen with nanofiltration pretreatment and its distribution characteristics in landscape water[J]. Environmental Science, 2013, 34(6): 2256-2262. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	何启贤，刘久清，颜果春，等. 纳滤膜结构特征对纳滤过程分离性能的影响[J]. 工业水处理，2010，30(7)：22-25.HE Qixian, LIU Jiuqing, YAN Guochun, et al. Effect of nano-filtration membrane characteristics on its separation capacity during the nano-filtration process[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2010, 30(7): 22-25. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	秦方锦，齐琳，王飞，等. 3种不同发酵原料沼液的养分含量分析[J]. 浙江农业科学，2015，56(7)：1097-1099.
[24]	王娟，陈国华，侯继灵，等. 一种新型复合纳滤膜对污水的深度处理研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报（自然科学版），2008, 30(1)：112-115.WANG Juan, CHEN Guohua, HOU Jiling, et al. Advanced treatment of produced water with a novel composite nanofiltration membrane[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science ＆ Technology Edition), 2008, 30(1): 112-115. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	GONG H, YAN Z, LIANG K Q, et al. Concentrating process of liquid digestate by disk tube-reverse osmosis system[J]. Desalination, 2013, 326: 30-36.
[26]	TANSEL B. Significance of thermodynamic and physical characteristics on permeation of ions during membrane separation: Hydrated radius, hydration free energy and viscous effects[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 86: 119-126.
[27]	NGHIEM L D, COLEMAN P J. NF/RO filtration of the hydrophobic ionogenic compound triclosan: Transport mechanisms and the influence of membrane fouling[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, 62(3): 709-716.
[28]	朱洪光，王旦一. 混凝预处理厌氧发酵液对超滤膜通量的影响[J]. 农业机械学报，2012，43(4)：93-99.ZHU Hongguang, WANG Danyi. Influence of coagulation pretreatment on UF membrane flux of anaerobic fermentation slurry[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2012, 43(4): 93-99. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	NEBBIOSO A, PICCOLO A. Molecular characterization of dissolved organic matter (DOM): A critical review[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2013, 405(1): 109-124.
[30]	谭思源，沈岩，刘雁征，等. 纳米气泡对沼液滴灌系统灌水器的防堵塞效应与机理[J]. 农业工程学报，2022，38(14)：79-87.TAN Siyuan, SHEN Yan, LIU Yanzheng, et al. Effects and mechanism of using nanobubble to inhibit biofouling and scaling in biogas slurry drip irrigation emitters[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(14): 79-87. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	KHAN M T, Manes C L D, Aubry C, et al. Kinetic study of seawater reverse osmosis membrane fouling[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(19): 10884-10894.
[32]	路亚楠，王晓霞，马力通. 液体酸对碱溶酸析法提取泥炭腐植酸光谱学变化特征的影响[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析，2020，40(2)：574-578.LU Yanan, WANG Xiaoxia, MA Litong. Effect of liquid acid on the spectral characteristics during peat humic acid extracted by alkali-extraction acid-precipitation method[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2020, 40(2): 574-578. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	李梦晨，肖康，黄霞. 基于红外光谱聚类分析的纳滤膜污染动态发展行为研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析，2019，39(2)：421-427.LI Mengchen, XIAO Kang, HUANG Xia. Tracking the dynamic evolution of NF membrane fouling through clustering analysis based on ATR-FTIR spectra[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2019, 39(2): 421-427. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	李君，李佳怡，郭思晗，等. 不同来源的大豆水溶性多糖乳状液乳化特性及红外光谱分析[J]. 渤海大学学报（自然科学版），2021，42(4)：312-319.LI Jun, LI Jiayi, GUO Sihan, et al. Emulsion emulsifying property of microwave-assisted ammonium oxalate extraction soybean soluble polysaccharides-protein and infrared spectroscopy analysis[J]. Journal of Bohai University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 42(4): 312-319. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35]	TANG C Y, KWON Y N, LECKIE J O. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by humic acid-effects of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 290(1/2): 86-94.
[36]	沈其林，单胜道，周健驹，等. 猪粪发酵沼液成分测定与分析[J]. 中国沼气，2014，32(3)：83-86.SHEN Qilin, SHAN Shengdao, ZHOU Jianju, et al. Determination and analysis of composition in biogas slurry produced by swine manure digestion[J]. China Biogas, 2014, 32(3): 83-86. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	SVENSSON P D, HANSEN S. Redox chemistry in two iron-bentonite field experiments at ?sp? hard rock laboratory, Sweden: an XRD and Fe K-edge xanes study[J]. Clays and Clay Minerals, 2013, 61(6): 566-579.
[38]	周鸣天，张干伟，寇朝卫，等. XDLVO理论分析混合有机污染物的膜污染[J]. 水处理技术，2020，46(4)：73-77.ZHOU Mingtian, ZHANG Ganwei, KOU Chaowei, et al. XDLVO theory analysis of membrane fouling by mixture organic pollutants[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2020, 46(4): 73-77. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	李荧，史文悦，张翠翠，等. 基于倒置A2O-MBR工艺处理综合污水中的膜污染分析[J]. 广东化工，2021，48(18)：114-116.LI Ying, SHI Wenyue, ZHANG Cuicui, et al. Analysis of membrane fouling in comprehensive wastewater treatment based on the inverted A2O-MBR process[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2021, 48(18): 114-116. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]	赵媛媛，王志，王纪孝，等. 含腐殖酸类有机物模拟废水超滤过程研究[J]. 膜科学与技术，2006(1)：42-46.ZHAO Yuanyuan, WANG Zhi, WANG Jixiao, et al. Studies on ultrafiltration membrane process of simulated wastewater containing humic acid organic substances[J]. Membrane Science and Technology, 2006(1): 42-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]	王文琼，周吉阳，李健驹，等. 乳清蛋白超滤过程中膜污染机制及监测方法研究进展[J]. 食品与发酵工业，2021，47(23)：272-279.WANG Wenqiong, ZHOU Jiyang, LI Jianju, et al. The mechanism of membrane fouling and monitoring methods in the process of whey protein ultrafiltration[J]. Food and Fermentation Industry, 2021, 47(23): 272-279. (in Chinese with English abstract)