高级检索+

基于探地雷达和深度学习的果树根径预测方法

Root Diameter Prediction Method of Fruit Trees Based on Ground Penetrating Radar and Deep Learning

  • 摘要: 针对果树根系相较于果树枝干或冠层难以观察和取样的问题,提出一种基于探地雷达和卷积神经网络的果树根系半径和深度预测方法。首先,使用开源软件gprMax构造所需的探地雷达A-Scan数据集;然后,将输入数据导入注意力模块,对特征信息重新分配权重,突出关键特征对模型的影响;最后,通过卷积层提取特征信息,通过全连接层将前面卷积层所学到的局部特征综合为A-Scan数据的全局特征,完成对根系半径和深度的准确预测。为了证明提出方法的可行性与有效性,在仿真数据和实测数据上分别进行实验。结果表明,该方法可以实现对根系半径和深度的有效预测,其中,在仿真数据上对根系半径预测的最大误差为2.9 mm,R2为0.990,均方根误差为0.000 68 m,深度预测最大误差为11.2 mm,R2为0.999,均方根误差为0.002 0 m;在实测数据上对根系半径预测最大误差为1.56 mm,深度预测最大误差为9.90 mm,总平均相对误差为5.83%,能够实现对根系半径和深度的准确预测。

     

    Abstract: The size and depth of fruit tree roots can reflect the growth and health of fruit trees and affect the profits of the orchardist. However, the roots are more difficult to observe and sample than the subaerial parts of fruit trees, such as the tree trunk, branches, and crown. Ground penetrating radar(GPR), as an emerging non-destructive testing technology, has the advantages of simple operation and convenient carrying. However, using GPR to quantify the radius of the roots is still a challenging task. To that extent, a prediction method for tree root radius and depth was proposed based on GPR and convolutional neural networks. Firstly, the simulated one-dimensional data of ground penetrating radar(A-Scan) was used as the data set to train the model. Secondly, the attention mechanism allocated more weights to essential features, highlighting key features and speeding up convergence. Finally, the feature information was extracted through the convolutional layer. The local features learned by the previous convolutional layer were integrated into the global features of the A-Scan data through the fully connected layer to predict the root radius and depth accurately. The model was tested on simulation data and real data. In the simulation experiment, the maximum error of root radius prediction was 2.9 mm, the coefficient of determination value was 0.990, the root mean square error was 0.000 68 m, the maximum error of root depth prediction was 11.2 mm, the coefficient of determination value was 0.999, and the root mean square error was 0.002 0 m. In the field experiment, the maximum error of sample roots radius prediction was 1.56 mm. The maximum error of sample roots depth prediction was 9.90 mm. The total average relative error was 5.83%, indicating the proposed method’s efficacy for estimating the radius and depth of roots.

     

/

返回文章
返回