SHI Jia-li, LEI Kai-liang, KANG Jia-wei. Water Retention and Drainage Technology at Weakly Permeable Soil Layers Interface in Foundation Pits[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2024, 22(3): 58-65,142.
Citation: SHI Jia-li, LEI Kai-liang, KANG Jia-wei. Water Retention and Drainage Technology at Weakly Permeable Soil Layers Interface in Foundation Pits[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2024, 22(3): 58-65,142.

Water Retention and Drainage Technology at Weakly Permeable Soil Layers Interface in Foundation Pits

More Information
  • Received Date: December 15, 2023
  • In the interlayer profiles of soil layers with significant differences in permeability, "interface water retention" is a major technical problem with high construction risks and is also very difficult to disposal during the engineering dewatering process. In order to ensure the quality of underground structure construction, improve soil strength, and reduce construction risks, an interlayer stagnant water drainage technology combining precipitation wells, collection wells, and gravel wells is proposed. Based on the on-site observation of a foundation pit dewatering project in the Loess Plateau area, the influence of gravel well size, well spacing, and setting depth on the stagnant water drainage effect of the sidewall of the foundation pit is calculated and analyzed, and the feasibility and rationality of this stagnant water drainage technology is preliminarily verified. Results are as follows. The setting of gravel wells can provide a smooth vertical seepage channel for stagnant water at the interface of low permeability soil layers, achieve proactive groundwater control in advance, and have beneficial effects on ensuring the quality of underground structure construction, soil layer drainage effect, and improving soil strength. The range of influence of gravel well drainage is mainly determined by the horizontal permeability characteristics of the low permeability soil layer. As the diameter of the gravel well increases, its stagnant water drainage range is 6 m~8 m, and it is recommended to arrange wells with a spacing of 10 m~15 m. The depth of the gravel well setting should penetrate the low permeability soil layer within the range of water level drop, and should not exceed the actual precipitation level to avoid the risk of water accumulation caused by the gravel well setting during the project implementation.
  • [1]
    于文龙,邓国华,亢佳伟.西安地铁工程降水风险评价及处置措施研究[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2021,19(6):158-164.
    [2]
    潘秀明,汪国锋,雷军,等.真空管井复合降水技术[J].都市快轨交通,2008,21(3):97-98.
    [3]
    任伟,王松,王龙.弱透水地层条件下基坑降水试验研究分析[J].现代隧道技术,2019,56(4):188-193.
    [4]
    邹斌,宋春雨,张冬冬,等.低渗透性土层高真空疏干井降水数值模拟[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2018,50(6):78-83.
    [5]
    何蕃民,彭涛,邓安,等.临河富水砂卵石层深基坑降水方案分析[J].科学技术与工程,2020,20(32):13386-13393.
    [6]
    李岗谷,张晓伟.管井井点降水在基坑工程中的应用[J].岩土工程技术,2002(2):110-114.
    [7]
    郭慧.管井降水技术在延安东川水厂基坑施工中的应用研究[J].地下水,2019,41(6):190-192.
    [8]
    赵枝艳,张常亮,沈伟,等.黄土-古土壤饱和渗透性与孔隙分布特征关系研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2024,51(1):47-56.
    [9]
    王成文.包气带弱透水性夹层的阻水减渗效应研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2016.
    [10]
    王文焰,张建丰,汪志荣,等.黄土中砂层对入渗特性的影响[J].岩土工程学报,1995,17(5):33-41.
    [11]
    张兴毅,曹文贵,崔鹏陆,等.考虑成层土阻水减渗效应的地表水入渗过程分析模型[J].长江科学院院报,2023,40(6):139-146.
    [12]
    李军.超真空双管疏干井降水应用技术[J].上海建设科技,2014(1):44-45.
    [13]
    章昕.深基坑降水技术浅析[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(S2):443-446.
    [14]
    徐云飞.气举法管井降水在深基坑工程中的应用[J].水利建设与管理,2019,39(2):26-29.
    [15]
    陈小羊,徐桃,张浩,等.改进型管井降水技术的研究与应用[J].隧道建设(中英文),2020,40(3):411-416.

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return