基于AHP-TOPSIS法的水库移民生计资本及生计稳定性研究

巫祖贤; 杨春; 姚凯文; 张玮玮

基于AHP-TOPSIS法的水库移民生计资本及生计稳定性研究

1. 华北电力大学水利与水电工程学院;
2. 广西桂禹工程咨询有限公司

详细信息

作者简介:
巫祖贤(1999-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为水利水电工程移民经济与管理。E-mail:840975025@qq.com

通讯作者:
姚凯文(1965-),男,教授,博士,研究方向为水利水电工程移民经济与管理。E-mail:Kwyao@qq.com

中图分类号: TV62;D632.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 0
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-12-17

Research on Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Stability of Reservoir Migrants Based on AHP-TOPSIS Method

1. School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, North China Electric Power University;
2. Guangxi Guiyu Engineering Consulting Co., LTD

摘要

摘要: 水库移民因征地搬迁而被迫重建生计系统，发掘移民生计资本优势，探究如何促进移民安置后的生计稳定和生计系统协调具有重要意义。以172项重大水利工程之一的广西LJ水利枢纽工程移民为例，以可持续生计框架为基础，考虑生计环境因素，采用AHP-TOPSIS法构建移民生计资本测度体系，使用收入多样性、自然资源依赖度及收入风险度衡量水库移民的生计稳定性，横纵向对比分析不同搬迁安置方式移民生计资本及生计稳定性变化，并根据耦合协调度修正模型研究其生计协调发展现状。研究结果表明：3种搬迁安置方式移民之间的6类生计资本增长存在显著差异，生计稳定性的变化也表现不同，由此影响了其生计协调发展状况。进城（集）镇安置移民得益于集镇商贸优势，将住房改造成商业门面以经营非农产业，有效利用经验优势和资本增量促进生计稳定，搬迁后的生计稳定性为三者最高，生计协调发展较好；集中居民点安置移民生计环境显著改善，自然资本降幅不大，人力资本较高，但尚未能充分利用，移民收入来源减少，生计稳定性下降，生计系统勉强协调；分散自主安置移民从业环境改善，人力资本增长率较高，移民自主发挥优势提高生计稳定性，生计系统接近初级协调发展。在本研究基础上，针对不同搬迁安置方式提出了促进移民生计可持续发展的建议。
- AHP-TOPSIS /
- 搬迁安置方式 /
- 生计资本 /
- 生计稳定性 /
- 耦合协调度
Abstract: Reservoir migrants are forced to rebuild their livelihood systems as a result of land acquisition and relocation, and it is important to explore the advantages of migrants’ livelihood capital and how to promote livelihood stabilization and coordination of livelihood systems after migrant resettlement. This paper takes the migrants of the LJ Water Conservancy Hub Project, one of the 172 major water conservancy projects, as an example, and takes the sustainable livelihood framework as the basis, considers the environmental factors of livelihood, and adopts the AHP-TOPSIS method to construct the migrants’ livelihood capital measurement system, and measures the livelihood stability of the reservoir migrants by using the income diversity, the degree of natural resource dependence and the degree of income risk, and analyzes the changes of the migrants’ livelihood capital and the stability of the migrants’ livelihoods in different ways of relocation and resettlement by comparing them horizontally and vertically and researches the current status of their coordinated development of their livelihoods based on the coupled coordinated correction model. The results of the study show that: There were significant differences in the growth of the six types of livelihood capital among the three types of relocation and resettlement migrants, and the changes in livelihood stability behaved differently, thus affecting the status of their coordinated livelihood development. Migrants resettled into urban（market） towns benefit from the advantages of market town commerce and trade, transforming their houses into commercial storefronts to operate non-agricultural industries, effectively utilizing the advantages of experience and capital increment to promote livelihood stability, and the stability of their livelihoods after relocation is the highest of the three, with a better coordinated development of their livelihoods. For migrants resettled in centralized settlements, there are significant improvements in the livelihood environment, modest declines in natural capital, higher but not yet fully utilized human capital, fewer sources of income for migrants, reduced stability of livelihoods, and barely harmonized livelihood systems. Decentralized and autonomous resettlement migrants have an improved working environment, higher rates of human capital growth, migrants’ autonomy to take advantage of their strengths to improve livelihood stability, and livelihood systems that are close to primary and coordinated development. On the basis of this study, recommendations for the sustainable development of migrants’ livelihoods are proposed for different relocation and resettlement methods.
- AHP-TOPSIS /
- relocation and resettlement methods /
- livelihood capital /
- livelihood stability /
- coupling coordination degree

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	龚一莼.水库移民家庭生计系统及生计可持续发展研究[D].北京:华北电力大学,2021.(GONG Y C. Study on livelihood system and sustainable development of livelihood of reservoir affected families[D].Beijing:North China Electric Power University,2021.)
[2]	王飞龙,姚凯文,刘炳文.水库移民家庭生计策略研究[J].人民长江,2023,54(1):245-250.(WANG F L, YAO K W, LIU B W. Livelihood strategies of reservoir resettlement households[J]. Yangtze River, 2023,54(1):245-250.)
[3]	滕祥河,杨先明,文传浩.自致努力、政府扶持与水电工程移民生计资本累积[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(2):80-91.(TENG X H, YANG X M, WEN C H. Self-motivated effort, government support and livelihood capital of the hydropower project re-settlers[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition),2022(2):80-91.)
[4]	马国璇,周忠发,朱昌丽等.改进可持续生计框架下易地扶贫搬迁前后农户生计对比分析:以贵州省贞丰县者相镇安置点为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(5):207-217.(MA G X, ZHOU Z F, ZHU C L. Comparative analysis of rural household’s livelihood before and after relocation under the framework of improving sustainable livelihood:A case study of the resettlement location in Zhexiang town, Zhenfeng county, Guizhou Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,2022,43(5):207-217.)
[5]	何仁伟,李光勤,刘运伟等.基于可持续生计的精准扶贫分析方法及应用研究:以四川凉山彝族自治州为例[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(2):182-192.(HE R W, LI G Q, LIU Y W. Theoretical analysis and case study on targeted poverty alleviation based on sustainable livelihoods framework:A case study of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province[J]. Progress in Geography,2017,36(2):182-192.)
[6]	许扬,保继刚.“阿者科计划”对农户生计的影响分析:基于DFID可持续生计框架[J].热带地理,2022,42(6):867-877.(XU Y,BAO J G. A study of farmer'livelihoods in “Azheke Plan”:Based on the DFID sustainable livelihood framework[J]. Tropical Geography,2022,42(6):867-877.)
[7]	刘倩,雷洋洋,喻忠磊,等.生计可持续性视角下精准扶贫的政策效应评估及其分异研究:以武陵山区石柱县为例[J].地理科学进展,2023,42(4):670-686.(LIU Q, LEI Y Y, YU Z L. Policy effect and differentiation of targeted poverty alleviation from the perspective of livelihood sustainability:Taking Shizhu county, Wuling mountains as an example[J]. Progress in Geography,2023,42(4):670-686.)
[8]	NATASHA S, EMILY G, R N L, et al. Developing sustainable small-scale fisheries livelihoods in Indonesia:Trends, enabling and constraining factors, and future opportunities[J]. Marine Policy,2021,132.
[9]	徐爽,胡业翠.农户生计资本与生计稳定性耦合协调分析:以广西金桥村移民安置区为例[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):142-148+164.(XU S, HU Y C. Coupling coordination analysis of capital and livelihood stability of farmers:A case study of the resettlement area of Jinqiao village in Guangxi[J]. Economic Geography,2018,38(3):142-148+164.)
[10]	马恩涛,姜超.基于AHP-TOPSIS法的我国地方政府债务风险测度研究[J].南开经济研究,2022(6):47-68.(MA E T, JIANG C. Research on risk measurement of local government debt in China based on AHP-TOPSIS method[J]. Nankai Economic studies,2022(6):47-68.)
[11]	钟然,秦小元,赖见令,等.基于AHP与TOPSIS的水电站能效管理水平评价方法研究[J/OL].中国农村水利水电:1-11[2023-07-12]. http://kns. cnki. net/kcms/detail/42.1419. TV. 20230711.1352.030.html.(ZHONG R, QIN X Y, LAI J L. Research on energy efficiency management level evaluation for hydropower station based on AHP and TOPSIS methods[J/OL]. China Rural Water and Hydropower:1-11[2023-07-12]. http://kns. cnki. net/kcms/detail/42.1419.TV.20230711.1352.030.html.)
[12]	鹿光耀,袁云云,吴春雅.数字普惠金融有益于丰富农户收入多样性吗?:基于江西“百村千户”的调研数据[J].江西社会科学,2022,42(6):65-74.(LU G Y, YUAN Y Y, WU C Y. Is digital financial inclusion beneficial to enrich the diversity of farm household income?:Based on the research data of “One Hundred Villages and One Thousand Households” in Jiangxi Province[J]. Jiangxi Social Sciences,2022,42(6):65-74.)
[13]	王会,赵亚文,温亚利.基于要素报酬的农户自然资源依赖度评价研究:以云南省六个自然保护区为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(12):146-156.(WANG H, ZHAO Y W, WEN Y L. Evaluation on the dependence of rural households on the natural resources based on factor returns:A case study on six natural reserves in Yunnan Province[J]. China population, resources and environment,2017,27(12):146-156.)
[14]	王淑佳,孔伟,任亮等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(3):793-810.(WANG S J, KONG W, REN L. Research on misuses and modification of coupling coordination degree model in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2021,36(3):793-810.)
[15]	张翔,李金燕,郭娇.基于熵权—耦合协调度模型的水源地可持续发展能力评价[J].生态经济,2020,36(9):164-168+174.(ZHANG X, LI J Y, GUO J. Evaluation of sustainable development capacity of water sources based on entropy weight-coupling coordination model[J]. Ecological Economy,2020,36(9):164-168+174.)