高级检索+

黄土高原沟壑区典型流域不同算法土壤侵蚀集成模拟比较

Ensemble simulation for soil erosion of a typical watershed in the gully region of Loess Plateau on the basis of different algorithms

  • 摘要: 为探究集成模拟技术对减少不同模型模拟土壤侵蚀的不确定性,以黄土高原昕水河流域为研究对象,采用Bates-Granger(BG)集成、等权重集成和Granger-Ramanathan集成技术,对广泛运用的Morgan-Morgan-Finney(MMF)、修正土壤流失方程(RUSLE)和中国土壤流失方程(CSLE)等进行集成模拟。集成模拟以流域出口泥沙观测进行率定,并根据纳什系数(NSE)、相关系数(R)、均方根误差(RMSE)进行模型模拟评价。结果表明:1)对于单一模型而言,MMF模拟效果在多数情况下优于CSLE和RUSLE模拟效果;2) 集成模拟可显著改善土壤侵蚀模型模拟效果,集成模拟前后,模型评价指标如NSE、R、RMSE分别提高23.6%、15.8%、46.4%;3) 不同集成模拟中BG集成算法在模型不确定性方面更加稳定、可靠。研究认为,在基于经验性模型开展流域土壤侵蚀模拟时,可以采用集成模拟技术进一步提升其模拟性能。

     

    Abstract:
    Background The Loess Plateau is one of the most severely eroded areas in the world, and quantification of soil erosion has been an important research work in the Loess Plateau of China.Although there exist many different soil erosion models for simulating soil erosion, few studies have used ensemble models to simulate soil erosion.
    Methods To investigate whether ensemble simulation can effectively improve soil erosion simulation, this study used the techniques of Bates-Granger (BG), equal weight (EW) and Granger-Ramanathan (GR) to integrate three widely used empirical-based soil erosion models, being Morgan-Morgan-Finney (MMF), Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), and Chinese Soil Loss Equation (CSLE), respectively, for simulating soil erosion and sediment yield of a loess watershed, i.e., Xinshui River watershed.The training period (1991-2000) was for estimating the weight of each model, and the testing period (2001-2005) was for examining the applicability of the various ensemble approaches.The model performance was evaluated in terms of Nash coefficient (NSE), correlation coefficient (R), and root mean square error (RMSE), by against the measured sediment yield at the outlet of the watershed.Uncertainties of the model simulation were also evaluated by means of confidence interval.
    Results 1) The three individual models differed in their performances, with MMF performing the best compared with the other two.2)Ensemble techniques greatly improved the performance of soil erosion simulation, and reduced uncertainties among various modelling tools.Comparing the best ensemble simulation with the best individual model, performances of NSE, R, and RMSE were improved by 23.6%, 15.8%, and 46.4%, respectively.3)BG technique provided more accurate predictions than the other methods did, the width of the confidence interval for BG technique smaller than that of the others, indicating a more stable and reliable performance.
    Conclusions The performance of the widely used empirical soil erosion models (e.g., RUSLE, CSLE) could be further enhanced by using the technique of ensemble simulation combined with uncertainty analysis in their applications.

     

/

返回文章
返回