高级检索+

湖南蒸水流域近20年土壤侵蚀时空变化

Spatio-temporal variation of the soil erosion in Zhengshui River Basin, Hunan province

  • 摘要: 为了解南方红壤丘陵区的土壤侵蚀时空变化特征,利用研究区及周边多个气象站1961—2018年的日降雨数据、多期土地利用数据、DEM数据、遥感影像等,采用空间插值等方法,获得蒸水流域1995、2000、2005、2010和2015年5个年度土壤侵蚀影响因子图,利用CSLE模型定量估算5个年度流域的土壤侵蚀量,根据水利部土壤侵蚀分类分级标准确定蒸水流域的土壤侵蚀等级分布情况,分析近20年来的土壤侵蚀的时空变化特征。结果表明:1)流域内降雨侵蚀力因子R年均值介于4 275至5 934 MJ·mm/(hm2·h·a)之间,具有较高的空间异质性,土壤可蚀性因子K均值为0.004 333 t·hm2·h/(hm2·MJ·mm),坡长坡度因子LS均值为4.45,植被覆盖与生物措施因子B年均值介于0.445 6至0.451 1之间,工程措施因子E年均值介于0.710 9至0.714 3之间,耕作措施因子T年均值介于0.705 6至0.709 5之间;2)蒸水流域5个年度的年均土壤侵蚀模数分别为412、520、479、530和528 t/(km2·a),年际差异显著,呈波动变化,5个年度的平均侵蚀模数为494 t/(km2·a),属于微度侵蚀等级;3)流域主要用地类型的土壤侵蚀情况为旱地>有林地>疏林地>水田;4)研究时段内,侵蚀性降雨变化是蒸水流域近20年时空变化最主要的驱动因素;5)流域水文站神山头站控制范围内侵蚀计算结果远大于实测输沙量,输沙量逐年降低,泥沙输移比逐年下降;6)土壤侵蚀模数空间差异较大,衡阳县、邵东县、衡南县,是未来水土保持的重点地区。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Soil erosion may lead to serious hazards, such as flood and land degradation and it is one of the global ecological and environmental issues. The quantitative evaluation of soil erosion at the basin scale can provide data support and reference for soil and water conservation planning and soil erosion control. At present, there are few studies on the spatial and temporal changes of soil erosion in the long time at the large watersheds scope.
    Methods This study was based on the basic theory of soil erosion science and the GIS technology. Factors of influencing soil erosion in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015 were calculated with daily rainfall data of climate stations from 1961 to 2018, land-use data and DEM data using the methods of spatial interpolation et al. CSLE model was used to assess the spatial variations of soil erosion intensity and determine the distribution of soil erosion grade from 1995 to 2015.
    Results  1) The annual mean of rainfall erosivity factor R value was between 4 275 and 5 934 MJ·mm/(hm2·h·a) in Zhengshui River Basin with high spatial heterogeneity, the average soil erodibility factor K value was 0.004 333 t·hm2·h/(hm2·MJ·mm), the average slope and slope length factor LS value was 4.45, the vegetation cover and biological practice factor B value was between 0.445 6 and 0.451 1, the engineering practice factor E value was between 0.710 9 and 0.714 3, and the tillage practice factor T value was between 0.705 6 and 0.709 5. 2) The average soil erosion modulus were 412, 520, 479, 530 and 528 t/(km2·a) respectively in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015. The average erosion modulus of this 5 years was 494 t/(km2·a), which belonged to the slight erosion level. 3) The modulus of soil erosion changed with elevation and the soil erosion of different land types from high to low was listed as rain fed cropland, forest land, sparse woodland and paddle field. 4) During the study period, erosive rainfall change was the main factor leading the change of the soil erosion modulus. 5) The calculated results of erosion in the control range of hydrometric station were much larger than the measured sediment. The sediment and the sediment transport ratio decreased year by year. High-coverage forests and grasses in the watershed, soil and water conservation projects participate in the process of intercepting sediment, causing most of the sediment to deposit locally or along the way, and ultimately failing to reach the sediment outlets of various hydrological stations, making the sediment delivery ratio much smaller.
    Conculsions The soil erosion calculation result is bigger than the observed value of sediment in Zhengshui River Basin. The assessment soil loss value is valuable for reference. Hengyang county, Shaodong county and Hengnan county are the key areas of soil and water conservation in the future.

     

/

返回文章
返回