高级检索+

国家公园全民公益性理念:公众参与及责任规制优化进路

The concept of public welfare in national parks: optimization approaches to public participation and liability regulation

  • 摘要: 全民公益性是我国国家公园体系的核心理念之一,其法治实现是生态文明建设与自然保护地体系完善的关键议题。文章以规范分析为主、实证分析为辅,结合比较法研究的范式,将生态正义论、环境权理论、可持续发展理论与国家公园跨区域、生态敏感、多元利益主体交织的特殊性相结合,立足《中华人民共和国国家公园法》实践图景,剖析我国国家公园全民公益性实现过程中公众参与和法律责任规范的现实困境,结合国内典型实践案例与美、韩、英、加等国的法治经验,指出当前制度存在公众参与规定笼统、公众参与保障失衡以及预防性规制缺失、生态环境修复责任模糊、惩罚性赔偿缺位、民事公益诉讼程序不明等问题。在此基础上,从公众参与和责任规制双核心视角提出优化进路:一方面优化公众参与规定,细化公众参与权利边界、建立跨区域协同参与机制、强化原住居民优先参与权与追责机制;另一方面健全法律责任体系,强化预防性责任规制、完善生态修复责任条款并确立“修复优先”导向、确立惩罚性赔偿制度与双重监督制度,为实现国家公园全民公益性提供坚实的法治保障。

     

    Abstract: The public welfare nature for all is one of the core concepts of China’s national park system, and its realization under the rule of law constitutes a key issue for the construction of ecological civilization and the improvement of the protected area system. Adopting normative analysis as the primary method and empirical analysis as the supplement, combined with the paradigm of comparative law research, this paper integrates the theories of ecological justice, environmental rights, and sustainable development with the particularities of national parks, including trans-regional distribution, ecological sensitivity and the intertwining of multiple stakeholders. Based on the practical context of the National Park Law of the People’s Republic of China, this paper analyzes the practical dilemmas regarding public participation and legal liability norms in realizing the public welfare nature of all national parks in China. Drawing on typical domestic practical cases and the rule of law experiences of countries such as the United States, the Republic of Korea, the United Kingdom, and Canada, the paper points out several issues in the current system. These include overly general provisions and unbalanced guarantees for public participation, a lack of preventive regulation, ambiguous liability for ecological environment restoration, the absence of punitive damages, and unclear procedures for civil public interest litigation. On this basis, this paper proposes optimization approaches from the dual-core perspectives of public participation and liability regulation. On the one hand, it optimizes the provisions on public participation by refining the boundaries of participation rights, establishing a cross-regional collaborative participation mechanism, and strengthening the preferential participation rights of indigenous residents and the accountability mechanism. On the other hand, the legal liability system must be perfected by strengthening preventive liability regulation, improving ecological restoration liability clauses with the orientation of "restoration priority," and establishing the punitive damages system and dual supervision system, so as to provide a solid legal guarantee for realizing the public welfare nature of all national parks.

     

/

返回文章
返回