Research of ε-Polylysine on the Texture Quality and Preservation Effect of Marrow Squash(Cucurbita pepo L. var. medullosa Alef.) during Storage
-
摘要: 为探究ε-聚赖氨酸(ε-PL)对金瓜贮藏期间质构特性及保鲜效果的影响,采用不同质量浓度的ε-PL(0、50、100、200、400、800 mg/L)浸泡处理崇金2号金瓜,然后置于(13±2)℃、相对湿度50%±5%的冷库中贮藏,并通过腐烂率、瓜皮、瓜肉和瓜丝的质构特性及主要营养品质的变化分析保鲜效果。结果表明:ε-PL处理可有效降低金瓜采后腐烂率,保持质构特性和营养品质。贮藏180 d期间,50 mg/L和100 mg/L ε-PL组的腐烂率显著低于CK组(P<0.05),200 mg/L、400 mg/L和800 mg/L ε-PL组无腐烂金瓜。其中,100 mg/L组瓜皮色泽相对保持较好,且延缓了瓜皮、瓜肉和瓜丝硬度的下降,保持了瓜皮和瓜肉的脆性及瓜丝咀嚼性和蓬松度,降低了细胞壁组分纤维素的降解速率,食用品质良好且营养价值较高。因此,100 mg/L的ε-PL处理对金瓜的保鲜效果最好。Abstract: In order to investigate the influence of ε-polylysine(ε-PL) treatment on texture quality and preservation effect of marrow squash(Cucurbita pepo L. var. medullosa Alef.),‘Chongjin No.2’marrow squash was soaked with different concentrations of ε-PL(0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 mg/L), then stored in cold room with a temperature of(13±2) ℃and a relative humidity of 50%±5%. Rotting rate, texture characteristics of skin, flesh, silk marrow squash and changes of main nutrient quality were used as indexes to evaluate the preservation effect. The results showed that, ε-PL treatment could effectively reduce the rotting rate, and maintain texture characteristics and nutritional quality of marrow squash. During storage of 180 days, the rotting rates of 50 mg/L and 100 mg/L ε-PL groups were significantly lower than that of control group(P<0.05), but there was no decay in 200 mg/L, 400 mg/L and 800 mg/L groups. Among them, the treatment which marrow squashes were immersed in 100 mg/L ε-PL, preserved skin color, delayed decline of skin, flesh and silk firmness, maintained fracturability of skin and flesh, and the chewiness and fluffiness of silk of marrow squash, and reduced the degradation rate of the cell wall component cellulose. Moreover, marrow squash treated with 100 mg/L ε-PL had good edible quality and high nutritional value during storage. Accordingly, 100 mg/L ε-PL group had the best preservation effect on marrow squash.
-
-
[1] 刘星,祁建民,朱忠南,等.应用SRAP标记分析金丝瓜(Cucurbita pepo L.)种质资源遗传多样性与亲缘关系[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(6):1172-1178. DOI: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2015.06.006. [2] 刘晨霞,乔勇进,王晓,等.崇明金瓜贮藏保鲜技术研究进展[J].农产品加工, 2020(5):69-72, 78. DOI: 10.16693/j.cnki.1671-9646(X).2020.03.021. [3] 王小英,谢苒荑,杨晓波.金瓜贮藏保鲜研究初探[J].保鲜与加工, 2003,3(6):26-27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6221.2003.06.011. [4] 王小英,杨晓波,谢苒荑.金瓜复合涂膜保鲜研究[J].食品科技, 2003(9):82-83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9989.2003.09.031. [5] 李云飞,刘颖.金瓜气调贮藏实验研究[J].食品工业科技,2002, 23(8):75-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0306.2002.08.028. [6] WANG L, DENG Y, WU M P, et al. Efficient ε-poly-L-lysine production by Streptomyces albulus based on a dynamic pHregulation strategy[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2022, 118:394-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2022.05.003.
[7] ALIREZALU K, HESARI J, YAGHOUBI M, et al. Combined effects of ε-polylysine and ε-polylysine nanoparticles with plant extracts on the shelf life and quality characteristics of nitrite-free frankfurter-type sausages[J/OL]. Meat Science, 2021, 172[2023-01-05]. https://doi. org/ 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108318. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108318.
[8] MENG Y C, XUE Q, CHEN J, et al. Structure, stability,rheology, and texture properties of ε-polylysine-whey protein complexes[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2022, 105(5):3746-3757. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21219.
[9] MIYA S, TAKAHASHI H, HASHIMOTO M, et al. Development of a controlling method for Escherichia coli O157:H7and Salmonella spp. in fresh market beef by using polylysine and modified atmosphere packaginge[J]. Food Control, 2014,37:62-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.09.028.
[10] GE Y H, WEI M L, LI C Y, et al. Reactive oxygen species metabolism and phenylpropanoid pathway involved in disease resistance against Penicillium expansum in apple fruit induced by ε-poly-L-lysine[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2018, 98(13):5082-5088. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9046.
[11] 郁杰,谢晶. ε-聚赖氨酸和L-抗坏血酸处理对鲜切菠菜品质的影响[J].食品科学,2019,40(17):277-283. DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20181225-299. [12] 王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006:222-223. [13] 曹建康,姜微波,赵玉梅.果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社, 2007:25-30. [14] LIN L, GU Y L, LI C Z, et al. Antibacterial mechanism of ε-Polylysine against Listeria monocytogenes and its application on cheese[J]. Food Control, 2018, 91:76-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.03.025.
[15] 邱源,朱忠南.金瓜种质资源加工性状主成分与聚类分析[J].中国瓜菜, 2009, 22(5):20-22. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1673-2871.2009.05.005. [16] 任玉锋,姜牧炎,马文平,等.灵武长枣采后低温贮藏期间细胞壁组分的变化[J].北方园艺,2018(18):114-117. DOI: 10.11937/bfyy.20174543. [17] 范春丽,刘晓娟,李玉华,等.短波紫外线处理对石榴保鲜效果的影响[J].郑州师范教育, 2021, 10(6):15-17. [18] 姚韶华,程雅清,武若楠,等.羧甲基茯苓多糖对香菇贮藏保鲜效果的影响[J].武汉工程大学学报, 2022, 44(4):428-433. DOI: 10.19843/j.cnki.CN42-1779/TQ.202112021. [19] 陈秋映,杨美艳,高向阳,等. ε-聚赖氨酸对赣南脐橙保鲜效果的研究[J].食品工业, 2021, 42(12):143-147. [20] 于继男,薛璐,鲁晓翔,等.冰温结合ε-聚赖氨酸对贮藏期间蓝莓生理品质的变化影响[J].食品与工业科技, 2015,36(1):334-337, 343. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.01.062. [21] 魏奇,李婕,刘蓓蓓,等. ε-聚赖氨酸盐酸盐对贮藏期间双孢蘑菇表面微生物生长和保鲜的影响[J].中国食品学报,2022, 22(3):256-264. DOI: 10.16429/j.1009-7848.2022.03.028. [22] 李江阔,李雪,张新锋,等.不同保鲜剂对黄花菜冷藏品质和酶活性的影响[J].食品科技, 2022, 47(4):26-32. DOI: 10.13684/j.cnki.spkj.2022.04.038. [23] 巴良杰,罗冬兰,吉宁,等.生物保鲜纸对李子贮藏期品质的影响[J].食品与机械, 2020, 36(7):140-143,226. DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2020.07.029. [24] 范飞,陈玉鹏,周洁,等. ε-聚赖氨酸盐酸盐改性PVA/LDPE复合薄膜对砀山梨保鲜效果[J].北方园艺, 2022(5):97-103. DOI: 10.11937/bfyy.20214098. [25] 袁帅,王秀红,白春美,等. ε-聚赖氨酸在果蔬采后贮藏保鲜中的应用研究进展[J].食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(17):196-203. DOI: 10.12161/j.issn.1005-6521.2021.17.031. [26] 李亚娜,吴凡,贺庆辉,等.壳聚糖/ε-聚赖氨酸对龙眼的保鲜性影响[J].武汉轻工大学学报, 2019, 38(5):35-39. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 2095-7386.2019.05.007. [27] 吴超,王江琴.壳聚糖、ε-聚赖氨酸及山梨酸钾对杨梅的保鲜效果研究[J].现代食品, 2021, 21:91-97. DOI: 10.16736/j.cnki.cn41-1434/ts.2021.21.023.
计量
- 文章访问数: 0
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0