黑龙江省乳品加工企业可持续发展能力影响因素研究

杨辉; 郑卓航; 焦燕妮; 马香鑫

doi:10.13881/j.cnki.hljxmsy.2021.08.0341

黑龙江省乳品加工企业可持续发展能力影响因素研究

东北农业大学经济管理学院

详细信息

作者简介:
杨辉(1977—),男,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为农业经济及乳文化,yanghui9797@sina.com

中图分类号: F426.82
计量
- 文章访问数: 1
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-08-24
- 刊出日期: 2022-11-19

Influencing factors and evaluation of sustainable development ability of dairy processing enterprises in Heilongjiang Province

College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University

摘要

摘要: 为提升黑龙江省乳品加工企业可持续发展能力，本研究首先基于可持续发展理论构建了黑龙江省乳品加工企业可持续发展能力评价指标体系，然后采用层次分析法分析黑龙江省乳品加工企业可持续发展能力的影响因素，最后采用TOPSIS法对黑龙江省4家乳品加工企业可持续发展能力进行评价。结果表明：在黑龙江省乳品加工企业可持续发展能力评价指标体系中，衡量经济可持续性最重要的指标是利润率，然后依次是总产值、主营业务收入和资产总额；衡量社会可持续性最重要的指标是公共事业投入，然后依次是法律法规遵守程度、纳税总额和就业人数；衡量技术可持续性最重要的指标是科研投入，然后依次是专利数、技术人员占总人员的比例和生产技术水平；衡量环境可持续性最重要的指标是环保投入率，然后依次是废水达标率、废气达标率和废渣达标率。从各级指标的排序综合来看，经济可持续性对黑龙江省乳品加工企业可持续发展能力的影响最大，技术可持续性和环境可持续性居中，社会可持续性最小。企业1的经济可持续性、社会可持续性和技术可持续性指标具有一定优势，但环境可持续性各项指标有待提升；企业2在就业人数和专利数方面较为突出，应对经济可持续性和环境可持续性指标加以重视；企业3的环境可持续性指标最为突出，在专利数方面表现最差，同时其经济可持续性、社会可持续性和技术可持续性指标均有待提升；企业4的各个指标均有待提升。综合来看，企业1的可持续发展能力最强，其次是企业2和企业3,企业4相对最弱。鉴于此，笔者提出了拓宽销售渠道，提升企业综合效益；注重技术创新，提高生产效率；加强绿色生产意识，明确企业发展模式；提高社会责任意识，加大公共事业投入力度的对策建议。
- 乳品加工企业 /
- 可持续发展 /
- 黑龙江省 /
- TOPSIS法 /
- 层次分析法
Abstract: In order to improve the sustainable development ability of dairy processing enterprises in Heilongjiang Province, this study firstly constructed the evaluation index system of sustainable development ability of dairy processing enterprises in Heilongjiang Province based on sustainable development theory, and then analyzed the influencing factors of sustainable development ability of dairy processing industry in Heilongjiang Province by analytic hierarchy process. Finally, TOPSIS method was used to evaluate the sustainable development ability of four dairy processing enterprises in Heilongjiang Province. The results showed that in the evaluation index system of sustainable development ability of dairy processing enterprises in Heilongjiang Province, the most important index to measure economic sustainability was profit rate, followed by gross output value, main business income and total assets. The most important indicator for measuring social sustainability was public service investment, followed by the degree of compliance with laws and regulations, the total amount of tax paid and the number of people employed. The most important index to measure the sustainability of technology was the investment in scientific research, followed by the number of patents, the proportion of technical personnel in the total personnel and the level of production technology. The most important index to measure environmental sustainability was the environmental protection input rate, followed by the wastewater compliance rate, the exhaust gas compliance rate and the waste residue compliance rate. According to the ranking of indicators at all levels, economic sustainability had the greatest impact on the sustainable development ability of Heilongjiang dairy processing industry, technical sustainability and environmental sustainability were in the middle, and social sustainability was the least. The indicators of economic sustainability, social sustainability and technological sustainability of enterprise 1 had certain advantages, but the indicators of environmental sustainability need to be improved. Enterprise 2 was more prominent in terms of employment and patents, and should pay more attention to the indicators of economic sustainability and environmental sustainability. Enterprise 3 had the most outstanding environmental sustainability index and the worst performance in the number of patents, while its economic sustainability, social sustainability and technological sustainability indicators need to be improved. All indicators of Enterprise 4 need to be improved. Overall, enterprise 1 had the strongest sustainable development ability, followed by enterprise 2 and enterprise 3, and enterprise 4 was relatively the weakest. In view of this, countermeasures and suggestions were put forward in the paper: broadening the sales channels and enhancing the comprehensive benefits of enterprises, paying attention to technological innovation and improving production efficiency, strengthening the consciousness of green production, clearing enterprise development mode, improving the awareness of social responsibility and increasing the investment in public utilities.
- dairy processing industry /
- sustainable development /
- Heilongjiang Province /
- TOPSIS method /
- analytic hierarchy process

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	苏惟真.黑龙江省乳制品消费变化研究:基于2012年和2020年数据分析[J].乳品与人类,2022(04):12-19.
[2]	刘辰洋,张聪.北纬47°黄金奶源地的乳业奇迹[J].乳品与人类,2021(05):14-19.
[3]	佚名.2021中国制造业民营企业500强榜单[J].中国产经,2021(19):66-75.
[4]	国家统计局.中国统计年鉴2020[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2020.
[5]	杨桐彬,朱英明.产业协同集聚对资源型城市可持续发展的影响[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(04):60-71.
[6]	刘绍庆.社会责任履行与企业可持续发展关系研究[J].企业改革与管理,2020(23):3-5.
[7]	冯富帅.可持续发展理论下的地区产业发展对策:以巴彦淖尔为例[J].现代商业,2020(33):105-106.
[8]	SAATY T L.层次分析法[M].许树柏,译.北京:煤炭工业出版社:1988.
[9]	杨秀敏,耿静,徐游,等.基于TOPSIS模型的海南岛土地综合承载力时空变化及障碍度诊断[J/OL].生态学报,2022(22):1-11[2022-10-04]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2031.Q.20220711.1245.038.html.
[10]	王灵芝,周戈耀,雷雪,等.基于TOPSIS法和综合指数法的贵州省中药民族药企业可持续发展能力综合评价研究[J].中国卫生事业管理,2021,38(01):29-33.
[11]	李博,乔慧玲,杨子涵.环渤海地区资源型城市可持续发展能力评价研究[J].湖北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,39(06):72-83.
[12]	张景川,刘红玉.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的陇南地区可持续发展能力实证研究[J].德州学院学报,2019,35(02):47-51,60.
[13]	岳密江.乳业可持续发展需注重五个方面[J].中国畜牧业,2015(19):29-30.
[14]	陈立勋.克东县全力打造乳业全产业链模式[J].中国畜牧业,2015(03):68-69.
[15]	孟小璐.基于PSO-LSSVM传统制造业可持续发展能力研究:以福建省为例[J].洛阳师范学院学报,2020,39(08):65-68,79.
[16]	宁春玲.乳制品进口对中国乳业的影响及发展途径探究[J].中国市场,2021(08):17-19,31.
[17]	张雨晴,于宁宁,杜嘉倩,等.奶业振兴背景下河北省乳制品加工业发展状况研究[J].中国乳业,2020(03):33-39.
[18]	陈法杰,崔登峰,王敏,等.基于SWOT分析的新疆乳制品加工业发展对策研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2020(12):22-25.
[19]	江雯.生态养殖与畜牧业可持续发展研究[J].畜禽业,2021,32(03):63,66.